Newsletters
Risk Central
Digital EditionFlood Adaptation Measures Offer Significant Economic Benefits
Flood adaptation measures, which could yield economic benefits 10 times greater than the cost of post-disaster rebuilding, are gaining focus among governments and insurers as a response to escalating global flood risk, according to a study by Swiss Re.
Natural catastrophes are becoming increasingly frequent and severe, with floods emerging as a primary culprit for massive economic losses worldwide, according to Swiss Re. In 2023 alone, natural disasters caused an estimated $280 billion in economic damages, with floods accounting for a staggering $51.6 billion of that total.
As the threat of flood-related disasters continues to grow, governments and insurers are intensifying their efforts to explore and implement flood adaptation measures. These initiatives aim to mitigate risks and promote economic stability in the face of climate change.
The report by Swiss Re underscores the critical importance of quantifying the benefits of climate adaptation projects to promote economic stability and resilience. This cost-benefit analysis is crucial to addressing the significant financing gap in this sector, the report noted.
“Investments in climate adaptation, such as flood preparedness, not only promote economic stability and create jobs, but also help keep people safe. Yet there is chronic underfunding,” stated Veronica Scotti, chairperson of public sector solutions at Swiss Re. “Quantifying the benefits of adaptation measures is a key step towards facilitating public-private investment and ultimately closing the huge financing gap.”
Growing Impact of Natural Catastrophes and Floods
Over the past five decades, floods have been responsible for nearly one-third (31%) of all losses attributed to natural catastrophes, according to the report. The pervasive nature of this threat is evident in urban areas, where floods rank as the most common natural disaster, affecting 58% of cities worldwide.
Experts categorize floods into three main types based on their location and cause. Pluvial floods occur when rainfall overwhelms drainage systems, leading to localized flooding. Fluvial floods, also known as river floods, happen when water bodies overflow their banks. Coastal areas face the risk of storm surge, a type of flooding caused by extreme weather events pushing seawater inland.
Challenges and Opportunities in Flood Adaptation
One of the primary hurdles in flood adaptation is chronic underfunding. Despite the pressing need for investment in climate resilience, many countries still hesitate to prioritize adaptation projects. For example, the study noted, a 2016 report noted that central and state government spending in Australia on natural catastrophe building resilience was AUD 100 million per year while funds spent on disaster recovery were AUD 2.75 billion per year.
Another challenge lies in determining the most effective flood adaptation methods. The absence of standardized measures makes it difficult to compare the cost-effectiveness and efficacy of various initiatives and policies. To address this, experts are turning to benefit to cost ratios (BCRs) as a standard measurement. BCRs compare the present value of future net economic benefits, discounted for the time value of money and inflation, to upfront adaptation costs.
This approach helps speed up the decision-making process and allows for more informed choices in adaptation strategies, Swiss Re stated.
Unlike traditional investments, the returns on flood adaptation projects come in the form of avoided costs. While quantifying these benefits can be complex, the long-term payoff is substantial. Adaptation measures can increase resilience for decades, providing enduring protection for communities and economies, according to the report.
Research indicates that moderate adaptation measures, such as raising dykes around economically developed areas, could reduce coastal flood damage in the EU and the UK by 90% by 2100. In some cases, investing in flood protection can yield remarkable returns, with BCRs reaching up to 120 – meaning one dollar invested can generate $120 in benefits in some cases.
Solutions and Recommendations
A range of solutions, from traditional infrastructure to nature-based approaches, offers promising results in mitigating flood damage and enhancing resilience.
Grey Infrastructure for Coastal Flood Protection: When it comes to safeguarding coastal areas, grey infrastructure such as dykes and levees has shown the greatest potential for reducing flood damage. These structures can be particularly effective in developed regions facing medium-to-low sea level rise projections. The return on investment for such projects can be substantial, with some flood protection investments yielding benefit-to-cost ratios (BCRs) of up to 120 – meaning every dollar invested can generate $120 in benefits.
Nature-based Solutions for Coastal Areas: Nature-based solutions, such as barrier island restoration and wetlands rehabilitation to name a few, can play a vital role in coastal flood protection. These approaches not only help mitigate flood risks but also provide additional ecological benefits, making them an attractive option for many coastal communities.
River Flood Adaptation Measures: For river floods, detention areas have emerged as the most cost-effective solution. These areas could potentially reduce expected annual flood damage in Europe by a staggering 75%. However, implementing detention areas can be challenging in regions with limited space or narrow floodplains, the report noted. In such cases, strengthening existing dykes presents a viable alternative, capable of cutting river flood damages by 60%. This approach is particularly beneficial in densely populated areas where space is at a premium.
Role of the Insurance Industry: Insurance and reinsurance companies can assist governments and policymakers in recognizing and understanding risk exposure, offering valuable insights for informed decision-making. Moreover, they can provide capacity and de-risking solutions to facilitate the development of interventions and ensure rapid recovery in the aftermath of flood events.
“Whilst re/insurance is traditionally a tool to manage the after-effects of significant shocks and events, it can also support risk mitigation, resilience building and adaptation investments through innovative solutions and early involvement in design and planning,” the report’s authors note.
By leveraging the expertise and resources of the re/insurance industry, communities can enhance their flood resilience strategies and better prepare for the challenges posed by climate change.
View the full report here. &
