MSIG USA’s Richard Pye on Construction Risk

Risk & Insurance recently spoke to Richard Pye, a senior vice president for Inland Marine with MSIG USA. Our goal was to talk about construction risk in the context of honoring our 2025 Construction Power Broker winners and finalists. The following is a transcript of that talk, edited for length and clarity.
Risk & Insurance: Thanks for meeting with us Rich. How are interest rates impacting the viability of construction projects and the number of construction start-ups?
Richard Pye: The construction industry is experiencing significant growth, with projects increasing in size and scope. This expansion requires substantial financing, making the recent drop in interest rates a highly positive development for the construction economy.
Lower interest rates are nothing but an improvement for the industry. They enhance the viability of projects and encourage the emergence of new construction ventures. The current movement in interest rates is creating a very favorable environment for the construction sector.
R&I: How about the impact of labor shortages on the construction sector compared, say, to product shortages?
RP: Labor shortages have a more significant impact on the construction sector than product shortages. While there is a shortfall in manufacturing and supplying high-tech equipment like electrical panels and connectivity devices due to high demand, the scarcity of skilled labor, such as plumbers, electricians, and subcontractors doing the finishing work, is a more pressing issue.
The lack of skilled labor can lead to resultant losses. For example, high-rise habitational risks have an increased potential for water damage. In a 35-story apartment complex or condo, there are plumbing fixtures in every unit on every level, including bathrooms and kitchens with sinks and numerous plumbing fixtures. If the skill isn’t there for proper installation, it can lead to significant problems when the water is turned on. At MSIG, we evaluate the contractors as closely as we evaluate the individual risk.
We know the ENR Top 400 Contractors and how they vet their subcontractors. Our engineering team is key to our success as well. They work closely with our underwriters and actively assist us in information development and assessment.
R&I: Can you provide an example of a success that you’ve had with this approach?
RP: We were asked recently to participate on a builder’s risk for an account that would be building multiple data centers. Rather than writing multiple individual risks, we suggested that the broker put together a master builder’s risk program. We then assisted them in developing their program with an assessment of the overall account, information needs for catastrophe assessment, site protection and monitoring, and understanding the risk from an underwriter’s perspective.
This helped the broker become more conscious of their client’s needs and were key factors in putting the program together. Construction specialists need to have a deep understanding of all the risks associated with a project.
One of the biggest concerns in such projects is the location and its exposure to natural hazards like wind, convective storms, earthquake, and flood. Our guidance helped the broker map out future projects and more accurately assess the exposures.
When brokers know their partner company’s expertise and appetite for risk it helps them to build better programs and provide more comprehensive coverage for their client. I’ve mentioned MSIG’s working relationship with our engineering staff. This partnership isn’t limited to the office. We travel with our engineers and have them sit in on broker and client meetings with us. The credibility this adds is invaluable.
R&I: What are the most frequent cause of losses that impact construction risk policies?
RP: In terms of severity, fire is still number one. We’ve all seen the video footage of major construction site fires in California, Texas, and across the country. There are many reasons for these fires, including flammable materials used, limited public and private fire protection at job sites, the changing nature and exposures at the job site, number of sub-contractors and others accessing the site, limited ability to enforce risk management protocols, arson, vandalism, etc.
For companies who focus on non-combustible construction, water damage is the Achilles heel of the industry both in terms of frequency and severity. There are many types and causes of potential water damage, both natural and due to installation error or equipment failure. They include plumbing issues like burst pipes and leaking fixtures caused by improper installation or weather, roof problems due to physical damage (wind, hail) or improperly installed roofing, draining issues around foundations, improper grading or excavation, HVAC malfunctions, and just natural events such as heavy or wind-driven rain, snowmelt, wind damage to walls or windows, and so forth.
There are ways we try and prevent this damage at MSIG USA. First and foremost is a thorough engineering review of site and Geotech plans, close attention to the construction timeline and when the building will be fully enclosed especially with regard to wind seasons, and, for interior water damage, the use of water monitoring systems with automatic shut-offs such as WINT, Water Hero and Brickeye to mitigate water damage losses.
R&I: Can there be added pressure on the underwriter due to the sheer size and value of the projects your team looks at, which you mentioned can be up to two billion dollars?
RP: There is always pressure on underwriters, whether it’s production or profitability. At the end of the day we have to balance both, underwriting the risk to our standards. At MSIG, those standards are very high. We have a dedicated risk engineering team that reviews every account before we release our quote. We feel very comfortable knowing that we’ve asked the right questions, evaluated the risk from all perspectives, and made informed decisions. If there is a loss, we know we did our jobs.
Most losses are partial rather than total. Once the ink is dry, it doesn’t matter if your participation is 1% or 10%, you’ve still put up $100M and that’s the important number. &