Financial Institutions Face Selective Underwriting Pressure Despite Broadly Competitive Insurance Market

Ample capacity is keeping pricing competitive across most lines for financial institution buyers, but underwriters are tightening terms in specific high-risk area,  according to Gallagher.
By: | June 1, 2026
financial services concept

The overall insurance market for financial institutions remains broadly competitive through the first quarter of 2026, with capacity running deep across directors and officers liability, cyber and property lines yet persistent loss experience in casualty, crime and catastrophe-exposed segments is prompting underwriters to exercise greater selectivity, according to Gallagher’s Q1 2026 Financial Institutions Market Update.

Banks, insurance companies and asset management firms each face a distinct combination of pressures, but across all three segments, the report finds that buyers who arrive at renewal with strong controls, clean data and a coherent risk narrative are securing the most favorable outcomes.

Segment-Specific Pressures Shape the Underwriting Conversation

For banks, commercial real estate (CRE) remains the dominant underwriting concern. Refinancing risk, valuation pressure in office and other distressed sub-sectors, and consumer credit normalization are drawing close scrutiny from underwriters, the report said. Institutions with clear CRE analytics and a well-articulated capital and liquidity story are best positioned to attract competitive pricing and broad terms, according to Gallagher.

M&A activity among banks is also drawing underwriter attention, particularly around deal-related litigation and disclosure claims in a potentially more permissive consolidation environment.

For insurance company clients, catastrophe volatility and social inflation are the defining themes. Natural catastrophe losses can create downstream exposures including coverage disputes and claims handling scrutiny that may contribute to errors and omissions activity, the report noted. Underwriters for D&O and Insurance Company Professional Liability are focused on reinsurance strategy, reserving, catastrophe aggregation and claims governance.

Asset managers, meanwhile, are contending with regulatory scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission and growing investor expectations around liquidity and transparency, particularly as private credit and other alternative structures become more prevalent, the report said.

Pricing Ranges Vary Widely by Line and Account Quality

Across the coverage lines most relevant to financial institutions, pricing trajectories in early 2026 reflect the divergence between competitive and stressed segments, Gallagher said.

D&O for stable public companies is commonly seeing flat to modest decreases in the low single digits, while challenged risk profiles continue to face firming, the report said. Professional liability conditions are firmer: Bankers Professional Liability renewals range from flat to +10%, Insurance Company Professional Liability from flat to +15% given loss experience and CAT volatility, and asset management E&O is generally more competitive for firms with favorable loss histories.

Cyber remains competitive for well-controlled accounts, with flat to modest decreases available, though the report noted that the pace of rate softening is slowing in segments affected by ransomware frequency and third-party vendor events.

The Financial Institution Bond market is described as a persistent loss leader for many insurers, with renewal pricing ranging from flat to +7% and continued pressure on deductibles and sublimits driven by social engineering and funds-transfer losses.

Employment practices liability is largely stable at flat to +10%, while fiduciary liability ranges from flat to +5% for stable accounts. Casualty — particularly commercial auto and umbrella/excess — continues to face consistent upward pricing pressure tied to social inflation, litigation funding and nuclear verdict trends, the report said.

Emerging Risks Add Complexity to Program Design

Generative AI adoption is reshaping underwriting conversations across all three financial institution segments, the report found.

Underwriters are asking pointed questions about model risk management, data governance, acceptable use policies and vendor controls. Institutions that can demonstrate a clear AI governance framework are seeing smoother renewals, according to Gallagher. At the same time, AI-enabled attacks are introducing new questions about how cyber policies treat AI-related incidents, and the report said insureds should evaluate whether standalone or supplemental solutions are appropriate for their risk profile.

Climate and catastrophe risk adds another layer of complexity, extending beyond property programs into lending portfolios and collateral concentrations. Real estate collateral in coastal, flood and wildfire-prone areas may face heightened volatility in both value and insurability, and severe weather can disrupt branch, data center and third-party service provider operations, the report said.

Obtain the full report here. &

The R&I Editorial Team can be reached at [email protected].

More from Risk & Insurance