Payers Benefit From Newer Claims Technology
The retirement of baby-boomer age computer professionals is helping drive more workers’ comp claims payers to abandon older, legacy-type claims management systems for nimbler software as a service (SaaS) technology.
The shift is occurring as the aging computer professionals, along with claims adjusters who spent their careers working with the assistance of the older legacy claims systems, are replaced by millennials accustomed to newer, smarter technology.
“The people who have been maintaining these legacy systems, as well as your adjusters who are used to using those systems, are getting older and exiting the business,” observed Shahin Hatamian of Mitchell International Inc. “You are bringing in younger people who don’t know how to use that legacy system and they want something that is easier to use, more configurable, and a little more automated. That is where newer systems come into play.”
The newer technology also accommodates a younger, less-experienced adjuster workforce with automation that eliminates more of their decision making.
Several other equally pressing reasons are pushing claims payers to continue a migration away from legacy systems to SaaS platforms. For one, more services now developed to improve workers’ compensation claims outcomes are created on these platforms, allowing for easier data interchange between claims payers’ systems and other services the claims payer uses.
“You would be hard pressed to not want to take advantage of the benefits of SaaS,” Hatamian said.
Legacy systems typically rely on in-house server technology for information storage and often were developed to meet a specific company’s needs. Their ongoing use, modification and maintenance usually requires the expertise of people familiar with that system.
“There are a group of legacy systems that have more attractive, contemporary user interfaces, but they are still built on architectures that are fairly rigid and require a lot of custom coding,” said Aaron Shapiro, executive director of sales, marketing and legal at Origami Risk.
By contrast, SaaS systems are cloud based and accessed via a web browser. While much of their updating can be done simultaneously for many customers, they also allow ease in customization, according to proponents.
“From a claims management standpoint there are so many moving variables at any point in time. … There are a plethora of people involved in the whole claims process.” — Tim Davidson, director of return to work solutions, Riskonnect
The newer technology’s flexibility allows easier configuration to meet a purchaser’s unique workflows, rather than requiring the purchaser to flex their operations around the technology, Shapiro added. It can ease risk managers’ connection with other company departments, such as safety, and with their company’s operations managers for quicker action on data revealing workers’ comp claim drivers.
“That leads to much higher engagement in the operational field,” Shapiro elaborated. “Where you have a risk manager that has a collaborative relation with field operations and safety there is an opportunity to automatically trigger workflows the second there is a report of injury.”
Similarly, information can be more easily shared with outside parties such as third party administrators, nurse case managers and other workers’ comp service vendors relaying information that may prevent a claim from growing more expensive.
“That is what SaaS products do,” said Nicholas Toal, vice president of business development and sales at JW Software. “It’s a solution that tries to make the workflow seamless,” eliminating challenges claims payers frequently encounter when attempting to connect older systems with third party claims services.
Factors driving the shift away from legacy systems to SaaS also include ease in updating the newer systems with state regulatory changes and less disruption when employees leave a company employing the technology, said Tim Davidson, director of return to work solutions at Riskonnect.
The most pressing reason for moving to SaaS, though, is the ability to connect with many sources of information — including industry trends and service provider data — impacting a claim, Davidson said.
“From a claims management standpoint there are so many moving variables at any point in time,” he elaborated. “It is not just the injured employee or employer. You are dealing with medical providers, you are dealing with bill review, you are dealing with nurse case managers, independent medical examiners. There are a plethora of people involved in the whole claims process.”
Improved integration of information from all those sources can help adjusters and other end users make better decisions, Davidson said.
Meanwhile, newer technology companies have emerged offering risk management information systems with “a broader platform of service capabilities,” said Tom Ryan, market research leader at Marsh’s Workers Compensation Center of Excellence. Those capabilities include data analytics and the conversion of data into highly customized reports and dashboards for workers’ comp claims management.
Simultaneously, employers are increasingly knowledgeable about the data management capabilities of risk management information systems, Ryan added.
“So a lot of employers are looking for more customized dashboards and tools to manage workers’ compensation,” Ryan said.
RMIS systems, and their dashboard technology for managing claims, have improved significantly over the past two to three years, added Duane Pifer, senior consultant and data analytics lead in the integrated casualty consulting group at Willis Towers Watson.
But the systems typically provide relatively stagnant information, Pifer added. Employers and other claims payers could benefit, he said, should the next generation of technology products allow claims payers to receive more interactive claims information delivered in smaller, more frequent, notifications, like those that social media sites push out concerning a user’s network contacts.
In that way alerts pushed-out to cell phones or tablets, for example, could inform employers of organizational changes — such as increased employee turnover in a specific production unit — that would likely impact claim filings, Pifer said.
Similarly, information could alert claims payers when claims are nearing a certain status point, such as a specific expense level.
“It is that kind of information, in small chunks, that Is intuitive that the user wants to see,” Pifer said. “I think the technology is beginning to get there and I know some RMIS have apps that provide that. But it is not widespread yet.”
When it comes to both RMIS and claims management systems, however, there is widespread agreement that the newer platforms are much simpler to use.