Opinion | Reviewing the Concentration of Risk

By: | February 25, 2025

Dan Reynolds is editor-in-chief of Risk & Insurance. He can be reached at [email protected].

Even if you didn’t own a home in the Pacific Palisades, or know someone who did, mourning would still be an appropriate reaction to the devastation that took place there in January.

The L.A. Times currently pegs damages at more than $250 billion. It’s already one of the costliest natural disasters in history.

I first set eyes on the Pacific Palisades in 1980. I was there because I was in love with a local girl.

If you’ve never seen it, when we lost what the Pacific Palisades was, we lost something beautiful. When I knew it, it was California living beyond anything I could have imagined.

Much of it is gone. To be rebuilt? Yes, probably.

But as we mourn what happened to the Palisades, I believe we must talk about concentration of risk. Our coasts and the big cities built on them are packed with people and property.

The days are mostly long gone when people needed to live in cities, because that’s where the factories or the offices were.

Fires menace the West while hurricanes attack the East. Can we begin to imagine and act on lifestyles where people don’t live quite so close together? Can we spread the risk? Can we learn to build houses in different configurations, to hopefully avoid block by block catastrophes?

Robert Frost wrote that “good fences make good neighbors.” Can a lot more space between us all do the very same, and at the same time, keep us safer and our underwriters happier? &

More from Risk & Insurance