From Individual to Collective: Transforming Resilience Strategies for a Safer Future

By: | April 12, 2025

Peter L. Miller, CPCU, MS, MBA, is president and chief executive officer of The Institutes Risk & Insurance Knowledge Group and a member of its Senior Management Team.

In an era of increasingly severe weather events and natural catastrophes, the question of how to protect our communities by making them more resilient is no longer theoretical but urgent. The rising tide of insured losses has triggered a cascade of consequences: soaring rates, restricted coverage and some insurers withdrawing from vulnerable markets. This new reality demands a fundamental shift in how we approach resilience, moving from individual responsibility to collective action. Mitigating climate risks obviously benefits property owners and their insurers by not only reducing losses and preserving market stability, but it also has wider benefits. For example:

  • Communities thrive when residents maintain intact homes and buildings, avoiding long-term economic harm. This prevents overwhelming local emergency response resources and services and protects the community’s tax base.
  • Lenders avoid defaults when homeowners maintain intact properties, which strengthens property-backed securities. Financial institutions can also create financing opportunities for individual and community resilience projects.
  • Construction contractors gain business through increased demand for resilient building materials and designs. This growth extends to jobs retrofitting property and infrastructure to better withstand known risks.

With the interests of multiple stakeholders aligned around resilience, stakeholders must collaborate to achieve meaningful results. Collaborative action overcomes fragmented resources, misaligned incentives, distributed expertise, jurisdictional complexities and shortterm thinking that prevent any single stakeholder from addressing the challenge alone.

While hosting the Predict & Prevent podcast, I engaged with several guests who emphasized the benefits of collective responsibility and collaborative solutions. For example, the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety has achieved success in Alabama and other states that adopted its FORTIFIED standard to make homes more resilient to catastrophes. Government leaders, insurers and building contractors collaborated to launch this successful initiative.

“There’s a deep partnership with the building community. The developers have not just been on board, they’ve been advocates,” said Roy Wright, CEO of IBHS.

“They actually did a study about five years ago to show that when you had a FORTIFIED home, it increased the value of the home by 7%. Home builders saw this as value generating.”

“If you were to strengthen your roof against a wind hazard or elevate your home against a flood hazard, obviously you as the homeowner are going to benefit from that,” said Daniel Kaniewski, managing director, public sector, Marsh. “But beyond just the homeowner, these other industries and governments benefit as well.

“For example, the lender is going to benefit because you’re less likely to default. An insurer is going to benefit because you’re less likely to have a claim. The local government is going to benefit because there’s an economic benefit to the investment itself as well as to the taxpayer or broader community if residents remain there after disaster,” Kaniewski said.

By recognizing our shared stake in resilience, we can create solutions that protect individual properties while preserving market stability and community wellbeing. Insurance companies and risk management professionals are key to making this happen. &

More from Risk & Insurance