Extreme Weather Disrupts 62% of Industrial Businesses as Coverage Gaps Persist

New FM survey reveals disconnect between risk awareness and actual preparedness for extreme weather.
By: | September 22, 2025
hurricane damage

A comprehensive survey of 800 risk decision-makers at global industrial, manufacturing and technology companies reveals that 62% of have experienced severe disruption from extreme weather events over the past three years, yet significant gaps remain between perceived and actual preparedness, according to a new survey report from FM.

“These gaps in awareness and mitigation are emerging at a time when businesses are under increasing pressure from their employees, investors, and regulators to demonstrate full awareness of these threats and plans to manage them, both within and beyond their own operations,” said Dr. Louis Gritzo, staff senior vice president and chief science officer at FM.

Board Attention Rises as Weather Patterns Shift

The increasing frequency of extreme weather events has pushed climate-related risks to the top of corporate agendas. Four in 10 companies now report that their executive boards regularly discuss extreme weather risks—placing it ahead of concerns about climate change, reputational damage, and even pandemic preparedness, according to the survey report.

This heightened focus reflects both the direct business impact and mounting pressure from multiple stakeholders. The survey found that 80% of risk decision-makers acknowledge growing employee concern about their organization’s weather exposure, while regulatory requirements for climate risk disclosure continue to expand across Europe, the United States and Australia.

“Five years ago, some clients with forward-thinking boards would ask us what FM is doing to mitigate climate or natural hazard-related risks,” Gritzo said. “Now, pretty much every client has it on their radar to some extent.”

Corporate boards demonstrate sophisticated understanding of their vulnerability, recognizing that extreme weather threatens not just their own facilities but entire business ecosystems, the survey found. When discussing weather risks, executives show equal concern for local infrastructure disruption (37%), supply chain interruption (36%), property damage (30%), and internal operations disruption (29%).

Coverage Shortfalls Create Vulnerability

Despite growing awareness, significant protection gaps leave businesses exposed to substantial financial losses, according to FM. Risk decision-makers estimate their insurance policies would cover only about half of potential weather-related losses, with property damage receiving the highest coverage at 53% and other impacts like reputational risk covered at just 43%.

The primary culprit is cost, with 44% of risk decision-makers and 49% of brokers identifying expense as the main barrier to securing adequate coverage for these risks. This challenge has intensified as catastrophic weather events drive insurance rates higher while inflation pressures businesses to cut costs elsewhere, the report noted.

Perhaps more concerning is the disconnect between perceived and actual risk awareness. While 95% of risk decision-makers believe they fully or mostly understand their weather exposure, insurance brokers paint a different picture—only 67% of brokers surveyed believe their clients possess this level of awareness.

Testing this confidence revealed that 74% of businesses underestimate the wind and flood exposure in their critical operating regions, with companies in North India, parts of China, and the United Kingdom showing particularly large gaps between perception and reality, FM found.

Untapped Resilience Opportunities Offer Path Forward

The survey identifies numerous underutilized strategies that could significantly improve weather resilience while potentially reducing insurance costs. Most notably, embedding risk engineering into new site design and construction ranks as the most impactful mitigation measure according to brokers, yet only 28% of companies have fully implemented this approach.

“We had a client building a new site on the coast of Vietnam,” recalled Benedict McKenna, division claims manager for the UK and Asia Pacific at FM. “The region was hit by a typhoon, and while practically everything surrounding their site was flattened, our client’s site experienced minimal damage. The difference? Our client’s site was risk-engineered from the outset.”

Other high-impact but underadopted measures include selecting weather-resilient equipment (23% full implementation), installing wind-resistant fastening systems (24%), and deploying automated wildfire detection systems (28%). For flood mitigation specifically, only 20% of survey respondents have redesigned interiors to manage water flow safely, despite 61% of brokers recommending this approach.

Forward-thinking companies are discovering that strategic resilience investments create a virtuous cycle, reducing both physical vulnerability and insurance costs, the report noted. Some organizations report maintaining stable insurance premiums over decades while competitors face five-fold increases, achieved through consistent investment in protective measures rather than accepting higher premiums for unchanged risk profiles.

“That is our challenge as an industry—to partner with clients and move from transactional oversight to working together to mitigate the risks,” said Gritzo.

Obtain the full report here. &

The R&I Editorial Team can be reached at [email protected].

More from Risk & Insurance