Kidnap & Ransom

Covering a Dangerous Risk

Demand is growing for kidnap, ransom and extortion insurance, with a specific need for real-time security intelligence around the world.
By: | December 14, 2016 • 5 min read

Two people are kidnapped and held for ransom somewhere in the world every hour, according to some estimates, and approximately $1.5 billion in ransom is paid to kidnappers every year.

Advertisement




Kidnap and extortion is on the rise across the globe, and demand for KRE (kidnapping, ransom and extortion) coverage is growing. Insurers are offering more comprehensive policies to meet the risk.

KRE insurance typically covers all risks related to kidnapping events. Most policies offer reimbursement for things like ransom and extortion payments, independent security consultants, crisis management, public relations campaigns, and accidental death and dismemberment.

These policies can also reach well beyond the event itself to include rehabilitation services, psychiatric care, salary replacement and relocation.

A typical cap on KRE policies is $1 million per occurrence. Due to the low claim rates, theses policies also offer cost-effective premiums relative to the risk they cover and the value they provide.

A March 2016 report by Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. said premiums range from $600 per million for companies with limited exposure to up to $3,000 per million for high-risk exposure.

Despite the growth in the KRE market, it’s hard to obtain accurate data on kidnappings and ransoms paid because many go unreported, said Christopher Arehart, senior vice president at Chubb. Organizations are unlikely to publicize the kidnapping of an employee, or even that they have a KRE policy.

While there’s no evidence to prove that having a policy could attract kidnappers or extortionists, it’s something most clients want to keep private.

“It’s a quiet product that is often sold discreetly and they hope they never have to use it. The last thing they want to do is let everyone know something like this has happened,” Arehart said. “But I can say we have seen a steady drumbeat of submissions and interest in our policy.”

A “Network of Expertise”

Dan Burns, president and CEO of specialty risk underwriters Pro Financial Services in Chicago, said customers aren’t just paying to insure the risk, they’re also buying a “network of expertise.”

Clients can often tap their KRE insurer and policy for security and legal advice, employee training and insight into local risks.

Dan Burns, president and CEO, Pro Financial Services

Dan Burns, president and CEO, Pro Financial Services

While a KRE policy can be a literal lifesaver in terms of securing the freedom of an employee, they are infrequently triggered and used more for peace of mind with employees, he said. Increasing publicity about global instability and kidnappings has more companies looking to these policies to establish a relationship with security experts.

“What you’re buying is access to a very experienced global security network that has experience and familiarity in dealing with situations that most clients have and never will encounter,” Burns said.

Arehart said that Chubb offers its KRE policyholders security advice, training and up-to-the-minute risk analysis on more than 100 countries from the Ackerman Group, an organization that specializes in crisis management, executive protection and hostage recoveries.

Paying Ransom is Illegal

“Kidnap and Ransom Insurance: At an Inflection Point,” a 2015 report by Cognizant, said the KRE market will be a $12.4 billion opportunity by 2019. Major insurers include AIG, Travelers, Hiscox and Chubb.

Cognizant noted, however, that insurers are grappling with challenges in underwriting, claims adjudication and loss control.

One issue that falls into a gray legal area is that under U.S. law, it is illegal for organizations or individuals to provide “material support or resources” to terrorists, which could be interpreted to cover ransom payments if a kidnapping is committed by a group the U.S. Department of State considers a terrorist organization.

In June 2015, President Obama said in a statement that the federal government would work closer with families to resolve hostage situations with a dedicated coordinator.

“What you’re buying is access to a very experienced global security network that has experience and familiarity in dealing with situations that most clients have and never will encounter.” — Dan Burns, president and CEO, Pro Financial Services

He reaffirmed that the government would not make ransom payments to terrorist groups, but left the door open for families to proceed without fear of government prosecution.

“In particular, I want to point out that no family of an American hostage has ever been prosecuted for paying ransom for the return of their loved ones. The last thing that we should ever do is add to a family’s pain with threats like that,” said Obama.

Neither the U.S. nor the Canadian government has ever prosecuted individuals or companies for paying ransom.

Brianna Guenther, an attorney at Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer law firm in Calgary, Alberta, said there is no definitive case law on when or if an insurance company can legally reimburse an insured for a ransom payment to a terrorist organization, although arguably there are statutes that could prohibit it.

“Based on past practice, if you end up paying to get someone back, it doesn’t seem likely that they would go after and prosecute you. But they still do have laws that give them the power to,” Guenther said.

The global legal environment isn’t any clearer. Since 2014, the U.N. Security Council has been urging countries to bar the payment of ransoms.

In November 2014, the U.K.’s Counter-Terrorism and Security Act banned the payment of ransoms by insurers. That affects all KRE policies written in the U.K.

Peter James, account executive in the global organizations division at Clements Worldwide, noted that all KRE policies only cover ransom payments on a reimbursement basis.

Evolving Criminal Tactics

KRE policies are also adapting to keep pace with evolving strategies including hoax “virtual kidnappings” and “virtual extortion.”

The Arthur J. Gallagher report identified virtual kidnapping as a “significant trend” that is increasing due to availability of data and the low cost of the crime.

Advertisement




The report said that many KRE policies offer coverage for virtual kidnapping without additional endorsements.

Regardless of how these schemes use technology, Arehart of Chubb said, a KRE policy provides value.

In most cases, risk consultants can evaluate and rule out virtual kidnappings with a proof of life evaluation, he said. A properly constructed KRE policy can also respond to some ransomware events where a criminal demands money or threatens to destroy files.

“A KRE policy can really shine when it’s less about the virus coming into the system and more about the human extortionist using a computer to get information,” Arehart said.

“We’re seeing more companies carry these policies out of a sense of duty or care,” Burns of Pro Financial said. “You need to do right by your employees and having this type of coverage in place is pretty important for them.” &

Craig Guillot is a writer and photographer, based in New Orleans. He can be reached at [email protected]

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

4 Companies That Rocked It by Treating Injured Workers as Equals; Not Adversaries

The 2018 Teddy Award winners built their programs around people, not claims, and offer proof that a worker-centric approach is a smarter way to operate.
By: | October 30, 2018 • 3 min read

Across the workers’ compensation industry, the concept of a worker advocacy model has been around for a while, but has only seen notable adoption in recent years.

Even among those not adopting a formal advocacy approach, mindsets are shifting. Formerly claims-centric programs are becoming worker-centric and it’s a win all around: better outcomes; greater productivity; safer, healthier employees and a stronger bottom line.

Advertisement




That’s what you’ll see in this month’s issue of Risk & Insurance® when you read the profiles of the four recipients of the 2018 Theodore Roosevelt Workers’ Compensation and Disability Management Award, sponsored by PMA Companies. These four programs put workers front and center in everything they do.

“We were focused on building up a program with an eye on our partner experience. Cost was at the bottom of the list. Doing a better job by our partners was at the top,” said Steve Legg, director of risk management for Starbucks.

Starbucks put claims reporting in the hands of its partners, an exemplary act of trust. The coffee company also put itself in workers’ shoes to identify and remove points of friction.

That led to a call center run by Starbucks’ TPA and a dedicated telephonic case management team so that partners can speak to a live person without the frustration of ‘phone tag’ and unanswered questions.

“We were focused on building up a program with an eye on our partner experience. Cost was at the bottom of the list. Doing a better job by our partners was at the top.” — Steve Legg, director of risk management, Starbucks

Starbucks also implemented direct deposit for lost-time pay, eliminating stressful wait times for injured partners, and allowing them to focus on healing.

For Starbucks, as for all of the 2018 Teddy Award winners, the approach is netting measurable results. With higher partner satisfaction, it has seen a 50 percent decrease in litigation.

Teddy winner Main Line Health (MLH) adopted worker advocacy in a way that goes far beyond claims.

Employees who identify and report safety hazards can take credit for their actions by sending out a formal “Employee Safety Message” to nearly 11,000 mailboxes across the organization.

“The recognition is pretty cool,” said Steve Besack, system director, claims management and workers’ compensation for the health system.

MLH also takes a non-adversarial approach to workers with repeat injuries, seeing them as a resource for identifying areas of improvement.

“When you look at ‘repeat offenders’ in an unconventional way, they’re a great asset to the program, not a liability,” said Mike Miller, manager, workers’ compensation and employee safety for MLH.

Teddy winner Monmouth County, N.J. utilizes high-tech motion capture technology to reduce the chance of placing new hires in jobs that are likely to hurt them.

Monmouth County also adopted numerous wellness initiatives that help workers manage their weight and improve their wellbeing overall.

“You should see the looks on their faces when their cholesterol is down, they’ve lost weight and their blood sugar is better. We’ve had people lose 30 and 40 pounds,” said William McGuane, the county’s manager of benefits and workers’ compensation.

Advertisement




Do these sound like minor program elements? The math says otherwise: Claims severity has plunged from $5.5 million in 2009 to $1.3 million in 2017.

At the University of Pennsylvania, putting workers first means getting out from behind the desk and finding out what each one of them is tasked with, day in, day out — and looking for ways to make each of those tasks safer.

Regular observations across the sprawling campus have resulted in a phenomenal number of process and equipment changes that seem simple on their own, but in combination have created a substantially safer, healthier campus and improved employee morale.

UPenn’s workers’ comp costs, in the seven-digit figures in 2009, have been virtually cut in half.

Risk & Insurance® is proud to honor the work of these four organizations. We hope their stories inspire other organizations to be true partners with the employees they depend on. &

Michelle Kerr is associate editor of Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]