2222222222

Resiliency Efforts

Risks Without Boundaries

Public and private sector experts are planning resiliency efforts to combat potential disaster losses and the problem of underinsurance.
By: | October 27, 2016 • 3 min read

Representatives from the private and public sector met with policymakers and members of the insurance industry in October to discuss ways to build greater resilience in cities.

Advertisement




“We have an opportunity to start planning now,” said former N.J. Gov. Christine Todd Whitman during “Cities in the Crosshairs: The Case for Investing in Resilience,” presented by Lloyd’s of London in partnership with the American Security Project, a nonpartisan national security think-tank.

“We must build more resilient systems because we know these impacts are coming,” said Whitman, who is board chairman of the American Security Project and a past administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

“We desperately need the private sector; this needs to be a collaborative approach.”

The participants at the New York conference discussed best practices in risk assessment, mitigation, adaptation and risk transfer.

The panel discussion included, from left, Kathleen Hamm, counselor to the deputy secretary at the U.S. Department of Treasury; Lloyd’s CEO Inga Beale; and former N.J. Gov. Christine Todd Whitman

The panel discussion included, from left, Kathleen Hamm, counselor to the deputy secretary at the U.S. Department of Treasury; Lloyd’s CEO Inga Beale; and former N.J. Gov. Christine Todd Whitman

The event comes on the heels of the release of Lloyd’s “City Risk Index,” it’s first-ever analysis of the potential impact of 18 catastrophic threats on the gross domestic product of 301 major international cities. The index uses a metric Lloyd’s calls [email protected] to quantify potential losses from threats to a location’s projected 10-year economic output.

“Our risk list shows how much the risk landscape is changing,” said Lloyd’s CEO Inga Beale, who said the report is a “wake-up call to us all.”

“Now the world is so much more about intangible risks,” she said.

“We need to innovate our products to this ever changing world.”

Just 10 threats account for 91 percent of the Total [email protected], according to Lloyd’s research, which was done in collaboration with University of Cambridge.

Nearly half are man-made, including market crash, cyber attack, power outage and nuclear accident.

“A lot of risks used to be geographically bounded,” Beale said.

“Now, with cyber and climate change, it is without boundaries.”

Market crash leads the list by a wide margin, with pandemic, windstorm, earthquake and flood rounding out the Top 5. Oil price shock, terrorism, drought, heat waves, tsunami and volcanos ares some of the other more costly disasters.

New York, and Los Angeles ranked No. 5 and 6, respectively, on the list of cities with high-asset values that are most financially exposed to disaster. Also high on the list were Taipei, Tokyo, Seoul, Manila, Istanbul, Osaka, Hong Kong and Shanghai.

Dense population coupled with climate warming and new technology contributes to higher damages associated with natural disasters.

“There are more people living in the cities than at any time in history,” said panel leader Dante Disparte, founder and CEO of risk and capital management firm Risk Cooperative.

Population density coupled with climate change and new technology contributes to higher damages associated with natural disasters. Meanwhile, the gap between what the insurance industry pays to cover a catastrophe compared with the actual clean-up cost is widening.

That insurance gap continues to be an elusive goal for the insurance industry at the moment, said Fielding L. Norton, deputy chief enterprise risk officer of XL Catlin.

The insurance gap “is a missed opportunity for my industry to be relevant and to help businesses and communities to get back on their feet in the aftermath of a disaster,” Norton said.

He said his company is working to anticipate catastrophes and devise innovative products to address them.

Advertisement




XL Catlin recently devised several programs to reach underinsured areas, and is one of eight participants in Lloyd’s newly created disaster risk facility. The facility involves syndicates cooperatively developing solutions to help developing economies tackle underinsurance and improve their resilience.

“One of the most important things we do for our company and for our clients is to not fail to imagine the things that are possible,” Norton said.

“Failure of imagination is a phrase we use all the time in our enterprise risk management group.”

“Lloyd’s has always been at the forefront of taking new risks,” Beale said.

“We’ve been very much underwriting alongside human progress for centuries and we must continue to do this.”

Juliann Walsh is a staff writer at Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]

Cyber Resilience

No, Seriously. You Need a Comprehensive Cyber Incident Response Plan Before It’s Too Late.

Awareness of cyber risk is increasing, but some companies may be neglecting to prepare adequate response plans that could save them millions. 
By: | June 1, 2018 • 7 min read

To minimize the financial and reputational damage from a cyber attack, it is absolutely critical that businesses have a cyber incident response plan.

“Sadly, not all yet do,” said David Legassick, head of life sciences, tech and cyber, CNA Hardy.

Advertisement




In the event of a breach, a company must be able to quickly identify and contain the problem, assess the level of impact, communicate internally and externally, recover where possible any lost data or functionality needed to resume business operations and act quickly to manage potential reputational risk.

This can only be achieved with help from the right external experts and the design and practice of a well-honed internal response.

The first step a company must take, said Legassick, is to understand its cyber exposures through asset identification, classification, risk assessment and protection measures, both technological and human.

According to Raf Sanchez, international breach response manager, Beazley, cyber-response plans should be flexible and applicable to a wide range of incidents, “not just a list of consecutive steps.”

They also should bring together key stakeholders and specify end goals.

Jason J. Hogg, CEO, Aon Cyber Solutions

With bad actors becoming increasingly sophisticated and often acting in groups, attack vectors can hit companies from multiple angles simultaneously, meaning a holistic approach is essential, agreed Jason J. Hogg, CEO, Aon Cyber Solutions.

“Collaboration is key — you have to take silos down and work in a cross-functional manner.”

This means assembling a response team including individuals from IT, legal, operations, risk management, HR, finance and the board — each of whom must be well drilled in their responsibilities in the event of a breach.

“You can’t pick your players on the day of the game,” said Hogg. “Response times are critical, so speed and timing are of the essence. You should also have a very clear communication plan to keep the CEO and board of directors informed of recommended courses of action and timing expectations.”

People on the incident response team must have sufficient technical skills and access to critical third parties to be able to make decisions and move to contain incidents fast. Knowledge of the company’s data and network topology is also key, said Legassick.

“Perhaps most important of all,” he added, “is to capture in detail how, when, where and why an incident occurred so there is a feedback loop that ensures each threat makes the cyber defense stronger.”

Cyber insurance can play a key role by providing a range of experts such as forensic analysts to help manage a cyber breach quickly and effectively (as well as PR and legal help). However, the learning process should begin before a breach occurs.

Practice Makes Perfect

“Any incident response plan is only as strong as the practice that goes into it,” explained Mike Peters, vice president, IT, RIMS — who also conducts stress testing through his firm Sentinel Cyber Defense Advisors.

Advertisement




Unless companies have an ethical hacker or certified information security officer on board who can conduct sophisticated simulated attacks, Peters recommended they hire third-party experts to test their networks for weaknesses, remediate these issues and retest again for vulnerabilities that haven’t been patched or have newly appeared.

“You need to plan for every type of threat that’s out there,” he added.

Hogg agreed that bringing third parties in to conduct tests brings “fresh thinking, best practice and cross-pollination of learnings from testing plans across a multitude of industries and enterprises.”

“Collaboration is key — you have to take silos down and work in a cross-functional manner.” — Jason J. Hogg, CEO, Aon Cyber Solutions

Legassick added that companies should test their plans at least annually, updating procedures whenever there is a significant change in business activity, technology or location.

“As companies expand, cyber security is not always front of mind, but new operations and territories all expose a company to new risks.”

For smaller companies that might not have the resources or the expertise to develop an internal cyber response plan from whole cloth, some carriers offer their own cyber risk resources online.

Evan Fenaroli, an underwriting product manager with the Philadelphia Insurance Companies (PHLY), said his company hosts an eRiskHub, which gives PHLY clients a place to start looking for cyber event response answers.

That includes access to a pool of attorneys who can guide company executives in creating a plan.

“It’s something at the highest level that needs to be a priority,” Fenaroli said. For those just getting started, Fenaroli provided a checklist for consideration:

  • Purchase cyber insurance, read the policy and understand its notice requirements.
  • Work with an attorney to develop a cyber event response plan that you can customize to your business.
  • Identify stakeholders within the company who will own the plan and its execution.
  • Find outside forensics experts that the company can call in an emergency.
  • Identify a public relations expert who can be called in the case of an event that could be leaked to the press or otherwise become newsworthy.

“When all of these things fall into place, the outcome is far better in that there isn’t a panic,” said Fenaroli, who, like others, recommends the plan be tested at least annually.

Cyber’s Physical Threat

With the digital and physical worlds converging due to the rise of the Internet of Things, Hogg reminded companies: “You can’t just test in the virtual world — testing physical end-point security is critical too.”

Advertisement




How that testing is communicated to underwriters should also be a key focus, said Rich DePiero, head of cyber, North America, Swiss Re Corporate Solutions.

Don’t just report on what went well; it’s far more believable for an underwriter to hear what didn’t go well, he said.

“If I hear a client say it is perfect and then I look at some of the results of the responses to breaches last year, there is a disconnect. Help us understand what you learned and what you worked out. You want things to fail during these incident response tests, because that is how we learn,” he explained.

“Bringing in these outside firms, detailing what they learned and defining roles and responsibilities in the event of an incident is really the best practice, and we are seeing more and more companies do that.”

Support from the Board

Good cyber protection is built around a combination of process, technology, learning and people. While not every cyber incident needs to be reported to the boardroom, senior management has a key role in creating a culture of planning and risk awareness.

David Legassick, head of life sciences, tech and cyber, CNA Hardy

“Cyber is a boardroom risk. If it is not taken seriously at boardroom level, you are more than likely to suffer a network breach,” Legassick said.

However, getting board buy-in or buy-in from the C-suite is not always easy.

“C-suite executives often put off testing crisis plans as they get in the way of the day job. The irony here is obvious given how disruptive an incident can be,” said Sanchez.

“The C-suite must demonstrate its support for incident response planning and that it expects staff at all levels of the organization to play their part in recovering from serious incidents.”

“What these people need from the board is support,” said Jill Salmon, New York-based vice president, head of cyber/tech/MPL, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance.

“I don’t know that the information security folks are looking for direction from the board as much as they are looking for support from a resources standpoint and a visibility standpoint.

“They’ve got to be aware of what they need and they need to have the money to be able to build it up to that level,” she said.

Without that support, according to Legassick, failure to empower and encourage the IT team to manage cyber threats holistically through integration with the rest of the organization, particularly risk managers, becomes a common mistake.

He also warned that “blame culture” can prevent staff from escalating problems to management in a timely manner.

Collaboration and Communication

Given that cyber incident response truly is a team effort, it is therefore essential that a culture of collaboration, preparation and practice is embedded from the top down.

Advertisement




One of the biggest tripping points for companies — and an area that has done the most damage from a reputational perspective — is in how quickly and effectively the company communicates to the public in the aftermath of a cyber event.

Salmon said of all the cyber incident response plans she has seen, the companies that have impressed her most are those that have written mock press releases and rehearsed how they are going to respond to the media in the aftermath of an event.

“We have seen so many companies trip up in that regard,” she said. “There have been examples of companies taking too long and then not explaining why it took them so long. It’s like any other crisis — the way that you are communicating it to the public is really important.” &

Antony Ireland is a London-based financial journalist. He can be reached at [email protected] Dan Reynolds is editor-in-chief of Risk & Insurance. He can be reached at [email protected]