Reputation Risk

Fake News, Real Threat

Far more than a prank, the spread of fictitious news is wreaking havoc on businesses and institutions.
By: | February 20, 2017 • 5 min read

The phenomenon of fake news has been around for many years, making it hard for us to separate fact from fiction. One of the earliest examples was the “New York Sun” claiming to have discovered a civilization on the moon in 1835.

But it wasn’t until “Pizzagate” last December that the potential severity of its impact on individuals and companies really hit home.

On Dec. 4, Edgar M. Welch, a father of two from North Carolina, was arrested and charged with firing an assault rifle in the Comet Ping Pong pizzeria in Washington D.C.

Welch read online that the restaurant was harboring young children as sex slaves as part of a child-abuse ring led by Hillary Clinton.  Alarmed, he drove six hours from his home to see the situation for himself. Little did he know, he’d been reading fake news stories about the restaurant.

On a wider scale, many people believe that fake news impacted the outcome of the U.S. election. In November, Buzzfeed said it discovered more than 100 pro-Trump fake news sites operated by Macedonian teenagers as for-profit click-farms.

What Is Fake News?

Fake news, by definition, is a completely made-up story, manipulated to resemble a credible news report and to attract maximum attention and advertising revenue.

Given the power of the internet, and the fact that an estimated 62 percent of the U.S. population now gets the majority of their news from social media, fake news spreads wide and is hard to stop.

Elizabeth Carmichael, owner, Carmichael Associates LLC

“Fake news spreads faster than ever,” said Elizabeth Carmichael, owner of Carmichael Associates LLC, a firm that provides compliance and risk management services to educational institutions. “The authors make stories sensational to get as many clicks as possible by getting people to forward them and retweet them. The fact that many of these fake news sources are anonymous, and often passed on by millions of people, means it’s extremely difficult to stop or prosecute offenders.”

Despite Facebook’s plan to flag false news stories by using fact checkers, there’s still a long way to go to eliminate the problem altogether.

William Atak, CEO of SafeOnNet, an insurer specializing in online reputational risk, said the potential for reputational harm increased significantly in recent years. Along with it, the potential for millions in lost profits.

“Fake news has always existed. Only now, the perpetrators have the tools and knowledge to create stories at just the right moment and exploit social media and its algorithms,” he said.

Nir Kossovsky, CEO of Steel City Re, whose firm specializes in reputation insurance for publicly traded companies, said that fake news has the ability to undermine a company’s business model and the credibility of its leadership. Worse, it can impact any organizations it is associated with.

Advertisement




“The specter of consequences arising from this post-fact type of communication can be far-reaching,” he said.

In the case of Pizzagate, Carmichael said, the restaurant’s owners faced not only reputational damage, but also the physical and psychological impact on its staff.

“The most worrying thing yet is that this has the potential to happen to almost any business in the world,” she said.

Pre-Emptive Strategy

In most circumstances where reputational damage has already occurred, a company would assess its losses and then take action, said Kossovsky. With fake news, however, he said, firms need to be proactive in dealing with the damaging misinformation that impairs their value as investors dump stock or threaten to sue directors for their actions.

“The general rule is lay low, shut up and say nothing until you have figured out what’s going on,” he said. But fake news can spread so rapidly that companies need to assess the potential consequences in advance.

Kossovsky said it is important to get all stakeholders on board from the outset, including investor relations, marketing and risk managers.

“Humans by their very nature tend to latch onto the first piece of information they find. Then it’s up to you to convince them otherwise,” he said.

“Therefore it’s key to take a position so that when fake news is circulated, stakeholders either don’t believe it or don’t pay any attention.”

Atak said that companies need to keep a watchful eye on the internet; act swiftly to communicate with customers, staff, boards of directors and investors; and utilize newsletters and social media.

“We have witnessed countless examples of companies that spent more than 25 years establishing a good reputation, only to see it ruined in an instant,” he said.

“The most worrying thing yet is that this has the potential to happen to almost any business in the world.” — Elizabeth Carmichael, owner, Carmichael Associates LLC

Carmichael said that denial is often the worst course of action once fake news is out. A better strategy is to put out an even bigger story to counter it.

She added that a company should include crisis communications in its disaster recovery or emergency response plan(s) and, once targeted, engage its communications team.

“That might be anything from putting out a disclaimer or a news story on their web page to getting the legitimate press to discredit the original fake news story,” she said.

“The big problem, however, is that once the fake news story has been banned or removed from one platform it quickly moves on to another.”

Reputation Insurance

Despite the viral nature of fake news, Kossovsky said, companies can take out insurance to cover themselves against reputational damage and losses to go alongside their risk mitigation strategy.

Nir Kossovsky, CEO, Steel City Re

“The whole point of the risk management process is firstly to pre-emptively mitigate against the impact of an assault of post-fact communication, and secondly to create a loss-absorption strategy to deal with the temporary panic that might arise.”

Carmichael added that while some insurers also offer crisis communications support, blanket specialized coverage for reputation risks is some way off.

“The best defense is to have good, well-monitored policies and procedures in the organization so the company can readily demonstrate with its own data the falsity of the story,” she said.

Advertisement




A worrying recent development witnessed by Atak is the rise of criminal gangs that create fake news solely for blackmail purposes.

“It is easy to cover your tracks online and the authorities are not yet capable, nor do they have the tools, to fight this new type of digital crime,” he said.

In order to stem the flow of fake news, Kossovsky believes that large corporations need to partner with the media to develop a market-based solution.

“Social media firms have the technology to vet a lot of this content, but they can only attack pieces of information at one time,” he said.

“Having an industry-wide solution in the form of a panel that sets the standard for the quality of news would go much further towards tackling the problem.” &

Alex Wright is a U.K.-based business journalist, who previously was deputy business editor at The Royal Gazette in Bermuda. You can reach him at [email protected]

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

4 Companies That Rocked It by Treating Injured Workers as Equals; Not Adversaries

The 2018 Teddy Award winners built their programs around people, not claims, and offer proof that a worker-centric approach is a smarter way to operate.
By: | October 30, 2018 • 3 min read

Across the workers’ compensation industry, the concept of a worker advocacy model has been around for a while, but has only seen notable adoption in recent years.

Even among those not adopting a formal advocacy approach, mindsets are shifting. Formerly claims-centric programs are becoming worker-centric and it’s a win all around: better outcomes; greater productivity; safer, healthier employees and a stronger bottom line.

Advertisement




That’s what you’ll see in this month’s issue of Risk & Insurance® when you read the profiles of the four recipients of the 2018 Theodore Roosevelt Workers’ Compensation and Disability Management Award, sponsored by PMA Companies. These four programs put workers front and center in everything they do.

“We were focused on building up a program with an eye on our partner experience. Cost was at the bottom of the list. Doing a better job by our partners was at the top,” said Steve Legg, director of risk management for Starbucks.

Starbucks put claims reporting in the hands of its partners, an exemplary act of trust. The coffee company also put itself in workers’ shoes to identify and remove points of friction.

That led to a call center run by Starbucks’ TPA and a dedicated telephonic case management team so that partners can speak to a live person without the frustration of ‘phone tag’ and unanswered questions.

“We were focused on building up a program with an eye on our partner experience. Cost was at the bottom of the list. Doing a better job by our partners was at the top.” — Steve Legg, director of risk management, Starbucks

Starbucks also implemented direct deposit for lost-time pay, eliminating stressful wait times for injured partners, and allowing them to focus on healing.

For Starbucks, as for all of the 2018 Teddy Award winners, the approach is netting measurable results. With higher partner satisfaction, it has seen a 50 percent decrease in litigation.

Teddy winner Main Line Health (MLH) adopted worker advocacy in a way that goes far beyond claims.

Employees who identify and report safety hazards can take credit for their actions by sending out a formal “Employee Safety Message” to nearly 11,000 mailboxes across the organization.

“The recognition is pretty cool,” said Steve Besack, system director, claims management and workers’ compensation for the health system.

MLH also takes a non-adversarial approach to workers with repeat injuries, seeing them as a resource for identifying areas of improvement.

“When you look at ‘repeat offenders’ in an unconventional way, they’re a great asset to the program, not a liability,” said Mike Miller, manager, workers’ compensation and employee safety for MLH.

Teddy winner Monmouth County, N.J. utilizes high-tech motion capture technology to reduce the chance of placing new hires in jobs that are likely to hurt them.

Monmouth County also adopted numerous wellness initiatives that help workers manage their weight and improve their wellbeing overall.

“You should see the looks on their faces when their cholesterol is down, they’ve lost weight and their blood sugar is better. We’ve had people lose 30 and 40 pounds,” said William McGuane, the county’s manager of benefits and workers’ compensation.

Advertisement




Do these sound like minor program elements? The math says otherwise: Claims severity has plunged from $5.5 million in 2009 to $1.3 million in 2017.

At the University of Pennsylvania, putting workers first means getting out from behind the desk and finding out what each one of them is tasked with, day in, day out — and looking for ways to make each of those tasks safer.

Regular observations across the sprawling campus have resulted in a phenomenal number of process and equipment changes that seem simple on their own, but in combination have created a substantially safer, healthier campus and improved employee morale.

UPenn’s workers’ comp costs, in the seven-digit figures in 2009, have been virtually cut in half.

Risk & Insurance® is proud to honor the work of these four organizations. We hope their stories inspire other organizations to be true partners with the employees they depend on. &

Michelle Kerr is associate editor of Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]