Choosing an Equipment Breakdown Carrier: The 6 Factors That Matter Most

White Paper Summary

Consider the following situations: A sensor fault on a primary unit triggers dependent systems to shut down, halting multiple operations at once. A boiler failure disrupts temperature-sensitive environments and processes throughout a facility. A power surge damages specialized production equipment, bringing day-to-day operations to a standstill until replacement or repair is possible.

These scenarios reflect how tightly coupled equipment and operations have become. In increasingly complex operating environments, equipment breakdowns have become business risk. Increased interconnectedness can mean that a failure that may have been contained can now cascade across an operation, interrupting production, spoiling inventory and disrupting the commitments a business has made to its customers.

Equipment breakdown (EB) coverage can respond to the breakdown and its direct financial consequences but helping a business manage the full exposure requires a carrier that looks at equipment risk in the context of the entire operation, not the asset in isolation. That difference, between insuring a piece of equipment and understanding how its failure moves through a business, is where the real exposure now lives.

To learn more about Travelers, please visit their website.