Big Data, Big Price?

By: | September 13, 2025

Dan Reynolds is editor-in-chief of Risk & Insurance. He can be reached at [email protected].

Information gleaned from a July New York Times piece about the construction of a new data center for Meta was startling. The tech giant bulldozed an oak forest and set about building a $750 million data center that uses 500,000 gallons of water daily.

Yes: They bulldozed an oak forest and the data center uses 500,000 gallons of water per day. Neighbors’ wells have since dried up, and Meta, of course, denies any relationship to that issue. The Times reports this water disappearance dynamic is not limited to Georgia. Better news has now surfaced in the form of an August announcement from Marsh that it has secured a carbon credit insurance policy for Chestnut Carbon, a carbon removal developer.

The firm is working with Microsoft to help it purchase seven million tons of carbon credits to help it become carbon neutral by 2030. As part of the deal, Chestnut will acquire and restore roughly 60,000 acres in the Southern U.S. and plant more than 35 million native hardwood and softwood trees.

Whew! For those of us keeping an eye on climate change, that certainly sounds like good news. But here’s the rub. As the Geek Elite pours billions into data centers to further the use of artificial intelligence, what environmental price are we going to pay in the long run? The upside for big tech in the short run is more profits.

The downside in the long run is that unhinged climate change will destroy the lives and livelihoods of millions. It remains to be seen whether land restoration efforts will be able to outrun the electricity and water appetite of these big data centers. Due to this data center appetite, higher water and electricity prices could well be in store for many of us in the U.S. &

More from Risk & Insurance