2025 Theo Award Winner: PepsiCo
PepsiCo saw an opportunity to improve ergonomic assessments across its beverage delivery operations. Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) represented the primary category of workplace ergonomic risk for its beverage delivery drivers.
Traditional ergonomic assessments were proving inadequate to assess the complex nature of this risk.
The safety team knew it would benefit from a different approach. Manual ergonomic assessments required safety staff to spend hours observing individual workers, gathering data on posture, movements, and physical demands. These assessments captured only brief moments in time, failing to address the cumulative nature of MSDs that could develop over long delivery routes.
The dispersed nature of delivery work made traditional one-on-one assessments particularly challenging, as safety teams would need to accompany drivers along their entire routes.
Derek Janquart, senior director of global EHS at PepsiCo, explained the company’s motivation for seeking a better solution: “Creating the justification for how we want to move forward in the future with investment in risk reduction technology for our employees really starts with what is the size of that impact?” he said.
Tackling the Problem
PepsiCo’s safety team implemented a comprehensive digital ergonomic assessment program using LifeBooster’s Senz technology, transforming the approach to understanding and mitigating workplace injury risks.
The connection to LifeBooster came through a former PepsiCo employee who had joined the technology company, introducing the team to innovative possibilities for ergonomic assessment.
Rather than relying on traditional manual assessments that yielded less than two hours of data after a two-hour investment, the Senz technology enabled safety professionals to spend just minutes setting up assessments that captured up to 14 hours of consecutive, comprehensive risk data.
The multi-point wearable sensors could easily capture data related to various risks, including repetitive strain, posture issues, heat stress, hand-arm vibration, and lifting hazards across any work environment.
PepsiCo used this technology in what Janquart described as “a research-oriented fashion.” The company had identified a test group performing delivery tasks that involved offloading products from trucks, bringing items into stores, and manipulating products on shelves.
“What we really wanted to do was understand the parts and pieces of the job that held potential for injury. From there, we needed to see how the job itself would be affected by a new or implemented control, meaning a motorized cart.” Janquart explained.
The team designed a comprehensive study to validate the effectiveness of this proposed solution. Baseline data was collected using existing manual delivery carts, then the team introduced the new motorized carts with sufficient time for driver adaptation to ensure inexperience wouldn’t skew results.
Over several weeks, the team gathered more than 1,155 hours of baseline data across 22 delivery routes, followed by another 1,050 hours of data after implementing the motorized carts.
The approach allowed for matched pairs analysis, where the same workers on identical delivery routes were assessed using both manual and motorized carts, providing direct comparison of potential ergonomic risks. This methodology virtually eliminated variables and provided evidence of the control’s effectiveness.
Janquart emphasized the strategic value of this data-driven approach: “Before you make a significant investment in a risk control, this LifeBooster technology gives you the ability to say, in a controlled fashion, ‘If we do this, here’s the likely effect of this investment.’ So, decisions are not made by blindly taking a shot in the dark.”
The comprehensive data collection revealed insights that traditional assessment methods likely would have missed. The analysis examined various factors including worker experience, height, and route volume to understand how different characteristics influenced injury risk and control effectiveness.
“Data becomes powerful when you know how to extract meaningful insights from it.” Janquart said. “The other thing is, as you use the technology a little bit, you become a little bit data greedy. I want to know this. I want to know that.”
This hunger for comprehensive understanding led the team to consider additional data points that could enhance analysis, such as worker rest patterns and sleep quality as predictors of activity levels and fatigue expression.
Success to Build On
PepsiCo’s innovative approach yielded remarkable results that validated both its methodology and investment in new equipment. After implementing the motorized carts, the company achieved a 12% decrease in back injury risk and a 5% reduction in upper extremity risk, representing a significant 10% overall risk reduction across all workers.
Organization: PepsiCo * Location: Purchase, N.Y. * Number of Employees: 319,000 * Category: Transportation & Logistics
Perhaps most impressive were the individual success stories within the broader improvement. Within the 22 assessed routes, some workers demonstrated a near complete elimination of shoulder strain and back strain risks, leading to further investigation to understand what made those particular routes so successful.

Derek Janquart, senior director of global EHS, PepsiCo
The data revealed that risk reduction benefits varied significantly among different worker populations. Newer drivers experienced the greatest improvement with an average 26% risk reduction, while shorter drivers saw a 20% average reduction. This granular insight enabled PepsiCo to make informed decisions about training improvements for newer drivers and prioritize initial deployment locations for maximum impact.
These findings validated the company’s significant investment in motorized carts. With hundreds of sites requiring equipment, the comprehensive data provided justification for a substantial financial commitment while demonstrating meaningful risk reduction for workers.
The program’s success extended beyond immediate risk reduction. Janquart said the technology revealed how ergonomic improvements depend heavily on individual worker characteristics.
“What you may find, for example, is that the risk improvement is better for some people than others,” he said. “So, if you have a control that benefits a shorter individual or a taller individual, those who are shorter or taller may not reap the same type of benefit.”
This understanding informed future control design considerations, helping the company identify optimal targets and create adjustability features for different worker populations.
Employees who participated in the program recommended continued use of the solution to identify other risks and provide comprehensive workplace insights. The organization expects these efforts to translate into reduced injury risk rates, increased productivity, and improved employee morale.
PepsiCo’s commitment to leveraging technology for worker protection continues to evolve. The company maintains an innovation team dedicated to exploring technologies involving artificial intelligence, sensors and other digital solutions to advance worker protection strategies.
“We certainly are considering all kinds of technologies as an attempt to use technology and digitalization to make an advancement in worker protection,” Janquart said. “It’s a big part of our strategy. It all comes down to making sure we find the right application for those technologies to make them effective.” &
The Theo Award celebrates its sophomore year, honoring 32 workers’ compensation programs for their excellence and service to workers across the nation. To learn more about the award and amazing qualities each winner possesses, visit here.