Environmental Risk

Severe Weather Imperils Fuel Pipelines

Severe weather incidents are increasing pipeline loss frequency, especially in places where environmental risk was not previously a problem.
By: | April 3, 2017 • 3 min read

April showers bring peril to pipelines.

The hurricane season does not start officially until June 1, but spring rains and snowmelt highlight the growing peril to the aging energy infrastructure in the U.S. from severe weather. In most cases the leaks are small and contained locally, but underwriters see the emerging risk as one of frequency as much as severity.

In late October, the Associated Press reported that a “freak storm” around Williamsport, Pa., “caused a Sunoco Logistics gasoline pipeline to rupture, spilling an estimated 54,600 gallons into a tributary of the Loyalsock Creek that flows into the Susquehanna River at Montoursville.

John O’Brien, energy practice leader, Ironshore

The storm dumped as much as seven inches of rain on Western and Central Pennsylvania, triggering mudslides, turning roads into rivers and sweeping away at least two homes.

“The energy industry has environmental risks because their assets are set in places that have exposed named perils,” said John O’Brien, energy practice leader at underwriters Ironshore.

“These perils are not new. What is new is the greater awareness of weather events. Pipeline losses in particular seem to have greater frequencies. At least they are being reported more frequently and the losses seem to be bigger.”

Advertisement




O’Brien noted that weather is not the only variable in the equation.

“Part of the perception is that there is more material in storage than ever. Both crude oil and refined products. The tanks and terminals are full. Storage capacity is at an all time high.” When weather comes in, it takes longer to drain tanks, and fewer options on where to put displaced material.

“Pipeline people understand the issues,” said O’Brien. “In the past they mostly focused on system integrity [from an operational and maintenance perspective]. Now issues like ground subsidence are being discussed more and more. There is definitely heightened awareness.”

Marcel Ricciardelli, senior vice president, environmental division, Allied World, corroborated that, “yes, the experts in weather tell us that, yes, we are in a cycle of more, and more severe weather incidents. And that has affected our industry and the industries we cover.”

“When much of the energy infrastructure now in place was installed, that was based on past weather incidents and experience to that time. As a result, today, we are not just seeing more and more severe incidents; we are seeing severity in new regions.”

Marcel Ricciardelli, Senior Vice President, Environmental Division, Allied World

That has led to some underwriters changing the way they run their business from underwriting to capacity deployment.

“The property and casualty guys can give you a thesis on this,” said Ricciardelli. “On the environmental side things are more nuanced. I can tell you some of the things we are starting to look more at are things like above-ground tanks that are below grade, such as in a parking structure.

“We are alert to concentrations of things like that in urban areas. That goes for smaller tanks to larger bulk storage. Overall there are clearly shifting considerations for our industry.”

“One of the best things about environmental coverage is that it includes recovery services.” — Marcel Ricciardelli, senior vice president, environmental division, Allied World

Traditionally property policies do not include much environmental coverage, Ricciardelli explained. “Environmental tends to come in at two spots: a time element within the casualty tower, and also within pollution. For those, the event is not really the issue. The trigger is simply a release.”

After a release from any cause, Ricciardelli added that “the most important thing is access for recovery. If the release was caused by a mudslide from heavy rains, is there flooding? Is the area stable enough to begin recovery? Or was the landslide from seismic activity?

“One of the best things about environmental coverage is that it includes recovery services. Most of the big pipelines have their own, but for smaller operators the access to equipment and expertise is important.”

Advertisement




Recovery assets and preparation brings Ricciardelli back to the challenge of worse weather in new places. “There are landfills that were sited in places that were considered safe and are now flood zones.”

There are also environmental hazards that are not weather-related. Earthquakes associated with underground injection of wastewater have been a serious concern.

“The attention has been on homes and buildings with cracks,” said Ricciardelli, “but this comes back on the energy industry. There are pipelines and storage terminals in places like Oklahoma that have documented increased seismicity, and those facilities are not built to withstand earthquakes.”

Gregory DL Morris is an independent business journalist based in New York with 25 years’ experience in industry, energy, finance and transportation. He can be reached at [email protected]

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

Business Interruption Risk

Hidden Risks of Violence

The Las Vegas shooting and other tragedies increase demand for non-physical damage BI coverages. The market is growing, but do new products meet companies’ new needs?
By: | December 14, 2017 • 5 min read

Mass shootings in the United States and the emergence of new forms of terrorism in Europe are boosting demand for insurance against losses caused by business interruption when a policyholder suffers no direct property damage, according to insurers.

Advertisement




But brokers say coverage for non-physical damage BI (NDBI), needs to evolve to better meet the emerging needs of corporate clients.

For years, manufacturing clients sought a more comprehensive range of NDBI coverages, especially due to the indirect effects of natural catastrophes such as the Thai floods that disrupted global supply chains in 2011.

More recently, however, hospitality and entertainment companies are expressing interest as they strive to adapt to realities such as the mass shootings in tourism hotspots Las Vegas and Orlando and terror attacks in such popular destinations as New York, Paris, Berlin, Barcelona and London.

In addition to loss of life and property, revenue loss is a real risk. Tragedies that cause a high number of fatalities can cause severe financial losses, especially for companies relying on tourism, as visitors shy away from crime scenes.

Precedents already exist. Paris received 1.5 million fewer visitors than expected in 2016, after the French capital was targeted by a series of deadly terror attacks the year before.

More recently, bookings declined in the immediate aftermath of a shooting at the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino in Las Vegas that took the lives of 58 people on October 1: Bookings at the hotel have since recovered.

Joey Sylvester, national director of operations & planning, Public Sector, Gallagher

“The recent horrific mass shootings in Las Vegas, Nev., and in Sutherland Springs, Texas, raised awareness and concerns about similar events occurring in areas where the public congregates, such as entertainment venues like sporting events, concerts, restaurants, movie theaters, convention centers and more,” said Bob Nusslein, head of Innovative Risk Solutions Americas, Swiss Re CS.

“The second highest NDBI cover to natural catastrophes is terrorism, including active shooter and mass shootings.”

However, products available in the market do not always provide the protection companies would like. Active shooter coverages, for example, focus mostly on third-party liabilities that policyholders may face after a shooting.

Loss-of-attraction policies often define triggering events with a high degree of detail. These events may need to be characterized as a terrorist attack or act of war by authorities. In some cases, access to the venue needs to be officially cut off by police.

It follows that an attack by a 64-year old ex-accountant who shoots hundreds of people for no apparent reason — as was the case in the Mandalay Bay tragedy — isn’t likely to align with a typical policy trigger.

But insurers say they are trying to adapt to the evolving realities of both mass shootings and terrorism to meet the new needs expressed by clients.

“The active shooting coverage is drawing much interest in the U.S. market right now. In Europe, clients are increasingly inquiring about loss of attraction,” said Chris Parker, head of terrorism and political violence, Beazley.

“What we are doing at the moment is to try and cross these two kinds of products, so that a client can get coverage for the loss of attraction resulting from an active shooting event.”

Loss-of-attraction policies cover revenue loss derived from catastrophic events, and underwriters already offer alternatives that provide coverage, even when no property damage is involved.

To establish the reach of such a policy, buyers can define a trigger radius — a physical area defined in the policy. If a catastrophic event takes place within this radius, coverage will be triggered. This practice is sometimes called “cat in a box.”

Some products specify locations that, if hit by a catastrophic event, will result in lost revenue for the insured. For resorts or large entertainment complexes, for example, attacks on nearby airports could cause significant loss of revenue and could be covered by NDBI insurance.

Measuring losses is a challenge, and underwriters may demand steep retention levels. According to Parker, excess coverage may kick in after a 20 percent to 25 percent revenue drop.

Insurers will also want proof that the drop is related to the catastrophic event rather than economic downturn, seasonal variances or other factors.

“Capacity is very large for direct acts of terrorism but lower for indirect terrorism and violent acts because the exposure is far greater,” said Joey Sylvester, national director of operations & planning, Public Sector, Gallagher.

“Commercial businesses, public entities, religious and nonprofit organizations have various needs for this type of coverage, and the appetite is certainly trending upward.”

It is difficult to foresee which events will cause business disruption. As a result, according to Nusslein, companies generally prefer to purchase all-risk NDBI covers rather than named-perils coverage.

“The main reason is that, if they have coverage for four potential NDBI events and a fifth event occurs, the fifth event is not covered,” he said. “Insurers, new to NDBI covers, still prefer named-perils covers over all-risk cover.”

Current geopolitical tensions are also fueling buyers’ demands.

“Many companies want nuclear, biochemical, chemical and radiological exclusions removed from terrorism NDBI covers. While this is more difficult for insurers, it is not impossible,” Nusslein said.

“War risk NDBI cover is becoming more sought after due to political tensions between the U.S. and North Korea.”

“Many companies want nuclear, biochemical, chemical and radiological exclusions removed from terrorism NDBI covers. While this is more difficult for insurers, it is not impossible.” — Bob Nusslein, head of Innovative Risk Solutions Americas, Swiss Re CS

Natural catastrophes still constitute the largest share of perils underlying NDBI products.  Parametric indexes are increasingly employed to provide uncontroversial triggers to policies, said Duncan Ellis, U.S. property practice leader, Marsh.

These indexes range from rainfall levels and wind speed to the measured intensity of earthquakes. Interest in this kind of NDBI coverage expanded after the recent hurricane season.

Advertisement




“The benefit of these products is that you do not have to go through the settlement process, which clients hate,” Ellis said.

NDBI policies are often bespoke, which is more common for very large insurance buyers.

“Usually, the market offers bespoke coverages for individual industries or clients, with very significant deductibles,” said Tim Cracknell, partner,  JLT Specialty.

NDBI cover can also help transfer regulatory and product recall risks. The life science sector is expressing interest in this kind of solution for cases where a supplier goes bankrupt or is shut down by a regulator, or a medication needs to be recalled due to perceived flaws in the manufacturing process.

Experts say that concerns still to be addressed are NDBI losses caused by cyber attacks and pandemics.

Capacity is an ongoing concern. According to Swiss Re CS, $50 million to $100 million, or even more, can be achieved through foundation capacity provided by a lead insurer, with syndicated capacity to other insurers and reinsurers, depending on the risk. &

Rodrigo Amaral is a freelance writer specializing in Latin American and European risk management and insurance markets. He can be reached at [email protected]