Sponsored: Global Risk Consultants

Don’t Let These Common Property Valuation Mistakes Ruin Your Insurable Values

Know the risks of inaccurate insurable property values.
By: | March 28, 2017 • 5 min read

Do you know the insurable value of your property?

Most risk managers would instinctively say “yes, of course!” Correctly valued property, after all, underpins a successful insurance program and ensures that all buildings, equipment and inventory that need to be replaced after a loss will indeed be covered.

“When people talk about values, they tend to forget the multiple impacts to a business. Things like loss estimates on the account, reinsurance issues, etc. all stem from identifying accurate insurable value”, says Rick Lunt, Global Manager – Valuation Services of Global Risk Consultants.

Accurate insurable values matter to carriers, too. Insurers and re-insurers increasingly depend on catastrophe models to assess the accumulation risk in their portfolios, but those models are ineffective if the wrong values are fed into them. If a carrier can rely on their insured’s values, it helps both parties build a more trusting relationship.

Establishing accurate insurable values, however, is not as straightforward as it may seem.

“Insurable values don’t just appear in a financial statement,” Lunt said. “You have to work to develop credible insurable values and keep them updated.”

Here are some mistakes commonly made when determining insurable values:

  1. Relying on Depreciated Value

Often times, the depreciated value of buildings, equipment and other property is pulled from financial statements, but that number is not a true reflection of replacement cost.

“Depreciated value is often brought into the insurance discussion when really it is not relevant to developing insurable replacement costs. What you really need to know is replacement cost, as defined by your insurance policy,” Lunt said.

To get at building replacement costs, companies may consult a professional contractor or in-house construction staff, utilize a building estimating tool, or rely on a replacement cost appraisal. For personal property, true replacement costs can be established with assistance from in-house engineering and purchasing staffs, discussions with equipment manufacturers and suppliers, or with a replacement cost appraisal.

  1. Not Utilizing Proper Cost Indices

Rick Lunt, Global Manager – Valuation Services

Unfortunately, determining correct values in the first place is only half the battle. The other half is keeping the values current and aligned with inflationary cost indices and market trends. Many times, decision makers fail to factor in these trends and let their insurable values gradually fall out of date.

“If the goal is to identify the current replacement cost of a piece of equipment that is five years old, there is a need to recognize the value of the original acquisition cost and apply inflationary cost trends to determine an approximate, current replacement value,” Lunt said.

If inflation runs at 2-3% per year, reported insurable values can be off 15% or more five years down the road should proper cost indexes not be applied.

Like inflation, the ups and downs of the construction market may have a significant impact on insurable replacement costs. Even if new construction is flat nationally, an insured’s specific location may be in a pocket experiencing a building boom, which may boost construction costs. “It’s important to be aware of how the construction market is performing on a local level, rather than just relying on available information regarding national trends,” Lunt said.

  1. Outdated Asset Records

The use of capital asset records is often a good starting point to begin developing insurable values. Based on the original acquisition cost of machinery and equipment, the application of proper cost trends can provide a reasonable estimate of current insurable replacement values. This approach, while a good one, is reliant upon the accuracy of the asset records themselves, which is based on how often records are updated in regards to the addition of new equipment, the retirement of old equipment, and the policy for expensing small items that are no longer on the books.

For example, tooling may be expensed on the books, yet still be functional and in production.

“In manufacturing plants, for example, things like tooling for equipment, dies and fixtures get written off quickly, but they are necessary for the operation of that equipment and need to be accounted for,” Lunt said.

From raw materials through to finished products, inventory can be a large component of insurable value. Decision makers should be aware of how finished goods are valued – either at selling price or cost. Most importantly, decision makers must be aware of how this value is established, and care should be taken to ensure that the reported value approach matches the provided coverage.

Turn to a Trusted Consultant

An experienced and trustworthy valuation service provider can help get the numbers right. Many third-party providers, however, work on a project-by-project basis. The relationship doesn’t extend past the actual valuation. That can be problematic if risk managers have follow-up questions or need recommendations on how to keep their values updated.

Global Risk Consultants (GRC) has long provided fire protection engineering, boiler and machinery, and other loss control services to clients. With a customer focus at the forefront, GRC expanded its service portfolio to include property valuation in January 2017, providing the service after identifying the opportunity to provide clients yet another unbundled loss control solution.

Lunt, who has years of experience as a professional appraiser, brings a unique perspective to integrating this service into an unbundled risk management program. With his valuable knowledge and experience on the carrier side, Lunt now heads up this GRC team worldwide.

“Unlike some other providers in this space, we take a consultative approach,” Lunt said. “We want to build lasting relationships with our clients, provide them with advice and guidance, answer questions, and act as their partner.”

The new valuation team will work with clients’ needs and within their budgets, providing everything from simple analyses in the form of desktop estimates, all the way through to on-site inspections.

“An on-site visit may not always be necessary if we can get enough information from past appraisals, asset records, building construction cost data, etc. But seeing property in person is always the best way to determine its value,” Lunt said.

“At Global Risk Consultants, it’s all about bringing technical expertise to the client. We’re focused on bringing the best information possible to the customer to build long-term partnerships.”

To learn more about Global Risk Consultants’ property valuation services, visit https://www.globalriskconsultants.com/.



This article was produced by the R&I Brand Studio, a unit of the advertising department of Risk & Insurance, in collaboration with Global Risk Consultants. The editorial staff of Risk & Insurance had no role in its preparation.

The only unbundled property loss prevention company to offer a complete portfolio of in-house, site-specific services and risk management solutions.

2017 RIMS

Cyber Threat Will Get More Difficult

Companies should focus on response, resiliency and recovery when it comes to cyber risks.
By: | April 19, 2017 • 2 min read
Topics: Cyber Risks | RIMS

“The sky is not falling” when it comes to cyber security, but the threat is a growing challenge for companies.

“I am not a cyber apocalyptic kind of guy,” said Gen. Michael Hayden, former head of the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency, who currently is a principal at the Chertoff Group, a security consultancy.

Gen. Michael Hayden, former head of the CIA and NSA, and principal, The Chertoff Group

“There are lots of things to worry about in the cyber domain and you don’t have to be apocalyptic to be concerned,” said Hayden prior to his presentation at a Global Risk Forum sponsored by Lockton on Sunday afternoon on the geopolitical threats facing the United States.

“We have only begun to consider the threat as it currently exists in the cyber domain.”

Hayden said cyber risk is equal to the threat times your vulnerability to the threat, times the consequences of a successful attack.

At present, companies are focusing on the vulnerability aspect, and responding by building “high walls and deep moats” to keep attackers out, he said. If you do that successfully, it will prevent 80 percent of the attackers.

“It’s all about making yourself a tougher target than the next like target,” he said.

But that still leaves 20 percent vulnerability, so companies need to focus on the consequences: It’s about response, resiliency and recovery, he said.

The range of attackers is vast, including nations that have used cyber attacks to disrupt Sony (the North Koreans angry about a movie), the Sands Casino (Iranians angry about the owner’s comments about their country), and U.S. banks (Iranians seeking to disrupt iconic U.S. institutions after the Stuxnet attack on their nuclear program), he said.

“You don’t have to offend anybody to be a target,” he said. “It may be enough to be iconic.”

The world order that has existed for the past 75 years “is melting away” and the world is less stable.

And no matter how much private companies do, it may not be enough.

“The big questions in cyber now are law and policy,” Hayden said. “We have not yet decided as a people what we want or will allow our government to do to keep us safe in the cyber domain.”

The U.S. government defends the country’s land, sea and air, but when it comes to cyber, defenses have been mostly left to private enterprises, he said.

“I don’t know that we have quite decided the balance between the government’s role and the private sector’s role,” he said.

As for the government’s role in the geopolitical challenges facing it, Hayden said he has seen times that were more dangerous, but never more complicated.

The world order that has existed for the past 75 years “is melting away” and the world is less stable, he said.

Nations such as North Korea, Iran, Russia and Pakistan are “ambitious, brittle and nuclear.” The Islamic world is in a clash between secular and religious governance, and China, which he said is “competitive and occasionally confrontational” is facing its own demographic and economic challenges.

“It’s going to be a tough century,” Hayden said.

Anne Freedman is managing editor of Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]