Workplace Safety Progress Has Stalled. Here’s What Employers Can Do About It.

National Safety Council CEO urges Congress to embrace proactive safety measures, AI integration and updated regulations to reverse flat fatality rates.
By: | May 18, 2026
Topics: News | Safety | Workers' Comp
Sunset Sky over US Capitol Building

Despite decades of safety improvements, roughly 4,337 workers died from preventable incidents in 2024 — the same rate as a decade ago — costing the U.S. economy $181.4 billion, according to testimony by National Safety Council CEO Lorraine Martin before the House Committee on Education and Workforce, Subcommittee on Workforce Protections.

One of the central issues driving unchanged fatality numbers is that most companies still rely on backward-looking metrics, according to Martin. Traditional measures such as OSHA’s total recordable injury rates track incidents that have already occurred and can actually obscure deeper risks.

A telling example, she cited: the 2010 Deepwater Horizon crew was celebrating strong safety metrics the very day of the explosion that killed 11 workers. From 2014 to 2024, recordable injury rates dropped more than 28%, yet workplace fatality rates held flat at 2.9 deaths per 100,000 workers.

Martin argued that this gap reflects the limitations of so-called lagging indicators, and called for a shift toward leading indicators — proactive measures such as hazard identification, risk assessments, safety training and compliance monitoring that help organizations spot and eliminate hazards before workers are hurt.

General Mills and Southern California Edison were cited as examples of companies that have moved to proactive, serious injury and fatality (SIF) prevention metrics as primary performance benchmarks.

AI and Outdated Regulations Present Both Risk and Opportunity

Technology, particularly artificial intelligence, is emerging as a meaningful tool for closing the gap between reported safety performance and actual workplace risk. AI-powered platforms can now analyze photos taken on a cellphone to flag potential hazards like improper machine guarding or fall risks in real time.

Computer vision deployments, like one piloted by ServiceCenter Metals, drove airbag safety compliance in loading docks from 25% to over 90% within two months while reducing near-miss incidents to zero, Martin testified.

On the regulatory side, the OSHA Lockout/Tagout standard for hazardous energy control, written in 1989, has never been updated despite the widespread availability of electronic and computer-based systems that current rules effectively prohibit.

Martin called for a modernization effort that brings together employers, labor organizations, technology companies and safety groups to ensure updated rules reflect today’s capabilities without weakening worker protections.

What Employers and Regulators Should Do Next

Martin outlined several concrete steps to accelerate progress. For employers, the NSC’s newly launched SIF Prevention Model offers employers — at no cost — a structured four-step framework for shifting from reactive response to proactive hazard management. The recently updated ASTM International E2920-26 standard provides a baseline roadmap for measuring safety performance with a SIF-prevention focus, though Martin emphasized it represents a floor rather than a ceiling.

At the federal level, Martin advocated for OSHA to establish a National Emphasis Program focused specifically on SIF prevention in high-hazard industries such as construction and transportation, which would signal that reducing fatalities requires a higher level of organizational maturity than simply meeting traditional compliance benchmarks.

Read the full testimony here. &

The R&I Editorial Team can be reached at [email protected].

More from Risk & Insurance