From Satire to Surveillance: Can Free Speech Be Insured?
In September, Graham Linehan was arrested at Heathrow Airport by five armed policemen. The Irish comedy writer was arriving in the UK to face potential jail time for tweeting a joke during a visit to the U.S., but was detained for a separately tweeted joke. He had to be rushed to hospital in the middle of his police interrogation.
All for a joke.
We’re in a place where whimsy can lead to jail time. “That’s not amusing” has become “Up against the wall, funny man.”
“All tyrants … hate comedy because they [believe they] have to be taken seriously,” said Monty Python’s Eric Idle. Take President Trump and the silencing of the late-night comedians.
Having been strangled by a condo manager, I still don’t fear condo managers, however psychopathic they may be. I do, however, greatly fear a government that sends gun-toting police to lock people up for tweeting jokes or sending e-mails containing content of which the government disapproves.
Having possibly sent a few such e-mails in the past 30 years, despite moderation being my guiding philosophy, the new communication risk so greatly concerned me that I turned to insurance to ease my fears.
I asked my broker to fashion a policy that would cover me for loss of earnings, emotional distress and physical injury, should the content of one of my published efforts or private e-mails lead to incarceration or other harm.
To the broker’s credit, he took the initial enquiry seriously, although he never got back to me. He probably didn’t wish to associate with a known comedian.
I phoned the helpline of the British Insurance Brokers’ Association (BIBA). They advised that if the Government jailed me for the content of an e-mail or a published article, I would not, as a convicted criminal, be able to look to insurance to protect me. “Insurance does not provide a get-out-of-jail-free card,” the BIBA representative said.
Insurance mitigates the risks we face in our daily lives. In my case, it cannot. Changing public standards leave me — and all the others like me — naked.
Any number of people could have me investigated: the first three that come to mind are a reader offended by something I write, a criminal whose activities I reported (even if I did so accurately), or a vindictive ex-girlfriend.
That I would be standing up for free speech in 2025 beggars belief. As do all thuggish administrations, the British Government sees free speech as a danger to society, because people might say something with which they disagree. That can no longer be allowed, apparently.
Obviously, I wouldn’t be among the first to be jailed for having a different opinion; I’d be at the very bottom of a list of subversive characters. Nevertheless, I face an uncertain future. Freedom of speech is indivisible. Either you have it, or you don’t. Britain doesn’t; the country has become “the North Korea of the North Sea.”
It’s in the nature of outlawing normal behavior that it never knows when to stop. Can you say with certainty that nothing you’ve expressed in the past 30 years would offend anyone?
First, they came for the comedians … &

