Bus Driver Walking Injury Not Work-Related, Virginia Court Rules

Virginia ruling on bus driver's injury claim redefines workplace accident standards, impacting future workers' compensation cases.
By: | January 22, 2025

A recent workers’ compensation claim denial for a school bus driver has sparked debate over workplace injury cases, potentially reshaping how employers and employees navigate on-the-job accidents and their aftermath, according to a ruling by Virginia’s Workers’ Compensation Commission.

The bus driver initially filed for medical and wage loss benefits, alleging a left foot and knee injury that occurred while walking at work. This seemingly straightforward claim, however, faced significant scrutiny during the legal proceedings.

The driver’s testimony provided a detailed account of the incident. On February 15, 2024, while on his regular bus route, he parked at a recreational center to use the bathroom. It was during this walk that he says he experienced severe pain in his left knee and foot, leaving him unable to continue walking without assistance.

In the ruling, Deputy Commissioner Plunkett found no compensable occupational accident as defined by the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act. The decision emphasized a crucial point in workers’ compensation law: The mere occurrence of an accident at work does not automatically render it compensable. Plunkett stressed the necessity of demonstrating a connection between the accident and the work required.

Despite the bus driver’s candid testimony, the legal standard for compensable injuries in Virginia proved to be a significant hurdle. The state’s law dictates that injuries resulting from simple acts such as walking, without additional work-related factors, are not eligible for compensation.

Legal Reasoning

Central to this case is the “simple acts” doctrine, which stipulates that injuries resulting from basic actions like walking, without additional work-related factors, are not compensable. In the bus driver’s situation, the lack of work-related exertion or contributing factors played a significant role in the decision, according to the commission.

To successfully prove an injury by accident under the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, four key criteria must be met, the commission stated.

First, there must be an identifiable incident. Second, this incident must occur at a reasonably definite time. Third, there needs to be evidence of an obvious sudden mechanical or structural change in the body. Finally, a causal connection between the incident and the bodily change must be established. In this case, the claimant’s inability to meet these criteria, particularly in demonstrating a connection between his work duties and the injury, led to the denial of compensation.

Access the full court opinion here. &

The R&I Editorial Team can be reached at [email protected].

More from Risk & Insurance