2222222222

Industry Update

Workers’ Comp Line in Robust Health

All signs point to positive trends in the workers’ comp market, which is good news for policyholders as well as insurers.
By: | June 1, 2017 • 3 min read

Recent data from the National Council on Compensation Insurance shows ongoing positive results for workers’ compensation insurers and favorable conditions for policyholders purchasing the coverage.

Advertisement




The most recent combined ratio for workers’ comp insurers reveals they are earning underwriting profits, lost-time claim frequency continues its long-term decline, and wage expansion is supporting premium volume growth, among other favorable conditions, according to NCCI’s “2017 State of the Line” information presented during the research and rating organization’s Annual Issues Symposium.

“We are kind of on a roll, it’s a good story,” NCCI President and CEO Bill Donnell told the symposium, held May 17-19 in Orlando, Fla.

Boca Raton, Fla.-based NCCI provides rating services for 38 states.

Kathy Antonello, chief actuary, NCCI

Insurers are not the only ones benefiting, according to information NCCI collected from The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers.

By 2016’s fourth quarter, 62 percent of agents responding to a survey reported they observed a decrease in workers’ comp premium rates for policy renewals. That stands in contrast to the 74 percent who observed premium rate increases in 2013.

NCCI also saw insurers provide policyholders “deeper discounts” during 2016,  Kathy Antonello, NCCI’s chief actuary, told the Annual Issues Symposium.

An even more recent commercial insurance index report, however, showed that May, 2017 marked the first time this year that renewal premiums increased for workers’ comp policies. Pricing for workers’ comp coverage rose 0.58 percent in May, in contrast to falling 0.19 percent the prior month, according to the May IVANS Index report released June 1, 2017 by Applied Systems.

Private insurers combined ratio, meanwhile, reached 94 percent for 2016. With the 2015 combined ratio also at 94 percent, 2016 marked the second consecutive year that the workers’ comp insurance industry recorded a six-point underwriting gain.

“We haven’t seen consecutive combined ratios at this level at least since 1975,” Antonello said.

The combined ratio is “even more remarkable,” because a single carrier’s experience added four points to the industrywide ratio. Antonello did not name the insurer, but she emphasized that the combined ratio would have stood at 90 percent for 2016 had it not been for that one insurer’s experience.

The industry’s loss ratio, which compares net incurred losses to net earned premium and is a component of the combined ratio, dropped to 53 percent for 2016 after reaching 54 percent the prior year.

“You have to go back to the mid-1990s to find ratios anywhere near the level we are seeing now,” Antonello said.

Insurer operating gains were also “well above average” for 2015 and 2016, Antonello said.

“We haven’t seen consecutive combined ratios at this level at least since 1975.” — Kathy Antonello, chief actuary, NCCI

Although insurers have been on “a good ride” during the past four years, the industry can’t be over confident, Donnell told the symposium.

“We work in a cyclical industry and history does repeat itself,” he cautioned.

Recent conditions, however, have been mostly favorable.

Private workers’ comp insurers’ net written premium growth was stagnant for 2016, hitting $40.1 billion for the year, compared to a total of $39.7 billion for 2015. When state fund net written premium results are included for 2016, the total amount reached $45.5 billion.

In contrast to 2016, private insurers wrote $37.8 billion in net written premium during 2005, a peak year prior to the Great Recession.  The total for 2005 stood at $47.8 billion when including state fund results.

Advertisement




While insurers’ net written premium growth stagnated during 2016, the U.S. economy added nearly 16 million jobs between the depth of the Great Recession in 2010 and 2016. The related payroll expansion during those years helped add $10 billion in net written growth, contributing to the $40.1 billion insurers reported through 2016.

Other trends reported by NCCI include:

  • Average lost-time claim frequency across states where NCCI recommends rates declined by 4 percent in 2016.
  • Workers’ compensation was the only property casualty line not experiencing 2016 combined ratio deterioration.
  • On average, state approved premium levels decreased 6.7 percent.
  • For 2015, physician costs equaled 40 percent of total workers’ comp claim medical expenses, while prescription drugs amounted to 11 percent of the expenses.
  • Repackaged drugs now represent a small portion of overall drug spend due to states implementing regulations.
Roberto Ceniceros is senior editor at Risk & Insurance® and chair of the National Workers' Compensation and Disability Conference® & Expo. He can be reached at [email protected] Read more of his columns and features.

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

Cyber Resilience

No, Seriously. You Need a Comprehensive Cyber Incident Response Plan Before It’s Too Late.

Awareness of cyber risk is increasing, but some companies may be neglecting to prepare adequate response plans that could save them millions. 
By: | June 1, 2018 • 7 min read

To minimize the financial and reputational damage from a cyber attack, it is absolutely critical that businesses have a cyber incident response plan.

“Sadly, not all yet do,” said David Legassick, head of life sciences, tech and cyber, CNA Hardy.

Advertisement




In the event of a breach, a company must be able to quickly identify and contain the problem, assess the level of impact, communicate internally and externally, recover where possible any lost data or functionality needed to resume business operations and act quickly to manage potential reputational risk.

This can only be achieved with help from the right external experts and the design and practice of a well-honed internal response.

The first step a company must take, said Legassick, is to understand its cyber exposures through asset identification, classification, risk assessment and protection measures, both technological and human.

According to Raf Sanchez, international breach response manager, Beazley, cyber-response plans should be flexible and applicable to a wide range of incidents, “not just a list of consecutive steps.”

They also should bring together key stakeholders and specify end goals.

Jason J. Hogg, CEO, Aon Cyber Solutions

With bad actors becoming increasingly sophisticated and often acting in groups, attack vectors can hit companies from multiple angles simultaneously, meaning a holistic approach is essential, agreed Jason J. Hogg, CEO, Aon Cyber Solutions.

“Collaboration is key — you have to take silos down and work in a cross-functional manner.”

This means assembling a response team including individuals from IT, legal, operations, risk management, HR, finance and the board — each of whom must be well drilled in their responsibilities in the event of a breach.

“You can’t pick your players on the day of the game,” said Hogg. “Response times are critical, so speed and timing are of the essence. You should also have a very clear communication plan to keep the CEO and board of directors informed of recommended courses of action and timing expectations.”

People on the incident response team must have sufficient technical skills and access to critical third parties to be able to make decisions and move to contain incidents fast. Knowledge of the company’s data and network topology is also key, said Legassick.

“Perhaps most important of all,” he added, “is to capture in detail how, when, where and why an incident occurred so there is a feedback loop that ensures each threat makes the cyber defense stronger.”

Cyber insurance can play a key role by providing a range of experts such as forensic analysts to help manage a cyber breach quickly and effectively (as well as PR and legal help). However, the learning process should begin before a breach occurs.

Practice Makes Perfect

“Any incident response plan is only as strong as the practice that goes into it,” explained Mike Peters, vice president, IT, RIMS — who also conducts stress testing through his firm Sentinel Cyber Defense Advisors.

Advertisement




Unless companies have an ethical hacker or certified information security officer on board who can conduct sophisticated simulated attacks, Peters recommended they hire third-party experts to test their networks for weaknesses, remediate these issues and retest again for vulnerabilities that haven’t been patched or have newly appeared.

“You need to plan for every type of threat that’s out there,” he added.

Hogg agreed that bringing third parties in to conduct tests brings “fresh thinking, best practice and cross-pollination of learnings from testing plans across a multitude of industries and enterprises.”

“Collaboration is key — you have to take silos down and work in a cross-functional manner.” — Jason J. Hogg, CEO, Aon Cyber Solutions

Legassick added that companies should test their plans at least annually, updating procedures whenever there is a significant change in business activity, technology or location.

“As companies expand, cyber security is not always front of mind, but new operations and territories all expose a company to new risks.”

For smaller companies that might not have the resources or the expertise to develop an internal cyber response plan from whole cloth, some carriers offer their own cyber risk resources online.

Evan Fenaroli, an underwriting product manager with the Philadelphia Insurance Companies (PHLY), said his company hosts an eRiskHub, which gives PHLY clients a place to start looking for cyber event response answers.

That includes access to a pool of attorneys who can guide company executives in creating a plan.

“It’s something at the highest level that needs to be a priority,” Fenaroli said. For those just getting started, Fenaroli provided a checklist for consideration:

  • Purchase cyber insurance, read the policy and understand its notice requirements.
  • Work with an attorney to develop a cyber event response plan that you can customize to your business.
  • Identify stakeholders within the company who will own the plan and its execution.
  • Find outside forensics experts that the company can call in an emergency.
  • Identify a public relations expert who can be called in the case of an event that could be leaked to the press or otherwise become newsworthy.

“When all of these things fall into place, the outcome is far better in that there isn’t a panic,” said Fenaroli, who, like others, recommends the plan be tested at least annually.

Cyber’s Physical Threat

With the digital and physical worlds converging due to the rise of the Internet of Things, Hogg reminded companies: “You can’t just test in the virtual world — testing physical end-point security is critical too.”

Advertisement




How that testing is communicated to underwriters should also be a key focus, said Rich DePiero, head of cyber, North America, Swiss Re Corporate Solutions.

Don’t just report on what went well; it’s far more believable for an underwriter to hear what didn’t go well, he said.

“If I hear a client say it is perfect and then I look at some of the results of the responses to breaches last year, there is a disconnect. Help us understand what you learned and what you worked out. You want things to fail during these incident response tests, because that is how we learn,” he explained.

“Bringing in these outside firms, detailing what they learned and defining roles and responsibilities in the event of an incident is really the best practice, and we are seeing more and more companies do that.”

Support from the Board

Good cyber protection is built around a combination of process, technology, learning and people. While not every cyber incident needs to be reported to the boardroom, senior management has a key role in creating a culture of planning and risk awareness.

David Legassick, head of life sciences, tech and cyber, CNA Hardy

“Cyber is a boardroom risk. If it is not taken seriously at boardroom level, you are more than likely to suffer a network breach,” Legassick said.

However, getting board buy-in or buy-in from the C-suite is not always easy.

“C-suite executives often put off testing crisis plans as they get in the way of the day job. The irony here is obvious given how disruptive an incident can be,” said Sanchez.

“The C-suite must demonstrate its support for incident response planning and that it expects staff at all levels of the organization to play their part in recovering from serious incidents.”

“What these people need from the board is support,” said Jill Salmon, New York-based vice president, head of cyber/tech/MPL, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance.

“I don’t know that the information security folks are looking for direction from the board as much as they are looking for support from a resources standpoint and a visibility standpoint.

“They’ve got to be aware of what they need and they need to have the money to be able to build it up to that level,” she said.

Without that support, according to Legassick, failure to empower and encourage the IT team to manage cyber threats holistically through integration with the rest of the organization, particularly risk managers, becomes a common mistake.

He also warned that “blame culture” can prevent staff from escalating problems to management in a timely manner.

Collaboration and Communication

Given that cyber incident response truly is a team effort, it is therefore essential that a culture of collaboration, preparation and practice is embedded from the top down.

Advertisement




One of the biggest tripping points for companies — and an area that has done the most damage from a reputational perspective — is in how quickly and effectively the company communicates to the public in the aftermath of a cyber event.

Salmon said of all the cyber incident response plans she has seen, the companies that have impressed her most are those that have written mock press releases and rehearsed how they are going to respond to the media in the aftermath of an event.

“We have seen so many companies trip up in that regard,” she said. “There have been examples of companies taking too long and then not explaining why it took them so long. It’s like any other crisis — the way that you are communicating it to the public is really important.” &

Antony Ireland is a London-based financial journalist. He can be reached at [email protected] Dan Reynolds is editor-in-chief of Risk & Insurance. He can be reached at [email protected]