Cover Story

The New Frontier of Care

Our Teddy Award winners in 2013 raised the bar yet again.
By: | November 1, 2013 • 10 min read

After nearly two decades of presenting the Theodore Roosevelt Workers’ Compensation and Disability Management Award, you might think the process of judging the awards would be more or less rote. In fact, the opposite is true. It has never been a more exciting time to witness the transformation of the industry, and to bear witness to how far employers have come, not just in their programs, but also in the way they think about injury prevention and management, and the value of a safe and healthy workforce.

A difficult economic climate has driven employers to double-down on their efforts to prevent incidents and injuries, and to be ever more creative in their efforts to rein in workers’ compensation and disability costs. If necessity is the mother of all invention, then workers’ compensation risk management is as inventive a field as you’ll ever encounter.

“Managing a successful workers’ comp program requires constant creativity to keep the bar moving in the right direction,” said Yolanda Romero, director of workers’ compensation for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA). “We often come up with what we believe is a great solution, however, eventually the program plateaus and new tweaks are needed to keep the momentum going.” Romero, who served as a Teddy Award judge for a decade after SEPTA won a Teddy Award in 2003, appreciates the accomplishments of this year’s finalists and winners, and knows what they’re up against. “The key is to keep the creative juices flowing constantly,” she said.


There isn’t enough time — or pages — to give you every detail of this year’s exceptional Teddy Award applicants, finalists and winners. So in the spirit of Fantasy Football, Risk & Insurance® has drawn together a “dream team” of injury prevention, workers’ compensation and disability management programs, to highlight the areas where these programs shine brightest.

A Golden Ounce of Prevention

The only good injury is the one that never happens — no one would argue the point. Zero workplace incidents or injuries remains the holy grail for many employers. But for most, that is a perpetually elusive goal. Over time, safety professionals and risk managers began to see that it wasn’t enough to give employees safety gear and train them to work safely. It wasn’t enough to conduct accident investigations or job hazard assessments. They needed to reach further.

That need has led employers into territories that were once considered fringe, including ergonomics, which was widely perceived as “new age voodoo” only two or three decades ago. Thankfully, that has changed. Boston-based Teddy Award winner Partners HealthCare is one of many organizations that now has a comprehensive ergonomics program with dedicated staff to conduct evaluations and address issues. Partners’ ergonomics staff responded to more than 900 service requests in 2012.

R11-13p24-27_01teddy2.indd“Managing a successful workers’ comp program requires constant creativity to keep the bar moving in the right direction.”
— Yolanda Romero, director of workers’ compensation for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

PHC also obtained a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health grant to fund its “Be Well, Work Well” project in collaboration with the Harvard School of Public Health: Center for Work, Health and Well-Being. The project’s aim is to assess and address the work environment as well as personal factors associated with increased risk for musculoskeletal disorders, and to promote ergonomic principles through small group and one-on-one training.

Stretching and core strengthening programs are now earning respect, when they were once thought of as a little over-the-top. But over time, participating companies began to see results in reduced injury frequency. Then others started taking a more serious look.

Arizona Public Service, the largest affiliate of Teddy Award finalist Pinnacle West Capital Corp., launched a pilot stretching and core conditioning program in 2011. The program gives employees the skills they need to improve balance and coordination in order to reduce injuries. The program also puts a focus on mental awareness and attention control — key factors in incident prevention. The program has resulted in a noticeable drop in strain and sprain injuries for the Phoenix-based energy holding company.

Worcester, Pa. civil construction company American Infrastructure has a stretching program that’s companywide. AI’s philosophy is that all employees are industrial athletes. That’s why everyone — from workers on job sites to office staff — participates in a morning stretching program. According to AI, the program serves a dual purpose. The stretching helps prime employees to be physically ready for the tasks ahead. It also helps prime them mentally, getting them thinking about working and moving safely right off the bat.

Another type of initiative that’s gaining traction in recent years is wellness programs. Once thought of as a “nice to have” that was more the purview of HR, wellness programs were perceived strictly as a means to reduce health care costs. Today, executives are catching on to the fact that healthier employees are not only less likely to get hurt, they also bounce back faster if an injury does occur, and have fewer complications related to comorbidities such as diabetes, obesity or heart disease.

That said, companies actively connecting the dots between wellness and injury outcomes are still somewhat few and far between. That’s another reason Pinnacle West earned the attention of the Teddy Award judges.

Pinnacle West has taken an active approach to employee health and wellness, launching its internally branded “Health Matters” program. The Health Matters program includes free screenings and assessments for employees, helps them assess their risk for disease and helps them develop personal wellness goals and plans. Employees are invited to utilize online weight loss coaching, smoking cessation programs, discounts on gym memberships, a vast library of healthy recipes and more.

Pinnacle West also recognizes that it’s not enough to tack a flyer about available wellness programs on the company bulletin board. That’s why the company is actively tracking employee participation in its programs, setting annual target goals for participation in each stage of the program and devoting resources to getting the Health Matters message out.


American Infrastructure’s wellness efforts are every bit as laudable. “Our focus,” the company wrote in its application, “has become not only to be America’s safest construction company, but America’s healthiest construction company as well.” Their commitment is clear. The company offers biometric testing for blood pressure, heart rate, cholesterol levels, blood sugar and more, and urges all employees to “know your numbers.” Employees can take their numbers and sit down with health coaches to develop action plans for improving their health. Among other initiatives, AI’s programs include a stepping program that helps employees track their steps throughout the day. Stepping challenges with prizes attached help keep people motivated. The company has also had great success with weight loss challenges.

“We’ve always been a company that goes beyond compliance. We wanted to take our safety culture to the next level,” said Bryan Schwartz, AI’s risk manager.

Working Toward Recovery

Incredible strides have been made in the area of return-to-work. Armed with a better grasp of the effect of lost time on both injury durations and the company’s bottom line, employers are more committed to keeping injured workers on the job and productive.

“Our focus has become not only to be America’s safest construction company, but America’s healthiest construction company as well.”
— American Infrastructure

Progressive companies are breaking free of the old mind-set of creating rigid transitional duty positions to accommodate work restrictions, and trying to fit all injured employees into those frameworks. Instead, they’ve shifted focus to the employee rather than the position, and on building customized transitional work around the injured employee’s capabilities.

Teddy Award winner PetSmart’s approach to return-to-work sets the right tone. All transitional duty jobs at PetSmart can be combined or modified to meet the needs of the associate’s restrictions. That focus helps guide managers to keep an open mind about transitional duties, and to look closely at what the injured employee is capable of doing. Injured employees at PetSmart are able to perform any number of essential store functions, from taking grooming appointments to helping with animal adoptions through in-store affiliate PetSmart Charities.

Teddy Award finalist Eisenhower Medical Center in Rancho Mirage, Calif., has taken a comprehensive approach. Three years ago, the organization took on the arduous task of assessing and cataloguing every job description, every essential and nonessential function of each position, and the skills or capabilities needed to perform each one of those functions. Initially, this database has been used to help identify the tasks most likely to cause injury. It is also used to guide treatment to help an employee resume the essential functions of his or her job faster. But during the recovery process, the database provides an invaluable, detailed body of information that helps the risk management and medical staff efficiently customize transitional positions based upon an injured employee’s specific abilities, and make adjustments smoothly as recovery progresses.

Solutions Large and Small

At Partners HealthCare, the best care for an injured employee is easy to find. The health system maintains eight Occupational Health Service clinics, staffed by occupational health nurse practitioners (OHNPs) experienced in evaluating and treating injured employees. OHNPs are the key point of contact for each case, coordinating treatment protocols, incident investigations and return-to-work plans. Dedicated claims specialists support the OHNPs. In turn, administrative assistants support the claims specialists — ensuring that they don’t become mired in paperwork and can focus on the needs of each injured employee. The OHS clinics are overseen by four medical directors — each one a board-certified and experienced specialist in occupational and environmental medicine.

Such a solution is unquestionably state-of-the-art. But the fact is that most employers outside the health care field don’t have the resources to follow that model. Nevertheless, plenty of employers are pulling out all the stops to get their people the care they need. Teddy Award-winning Miami-Dade County Public Schools, for example, uses a 24/7 call center for receiving notice of injuries. Injured workers are immediately directed to the best nearby specialty physician using a geo-access tool that identifies the providers nearest the injured worker’s location.


Other employers are finding ways to maximize the resources they do have. And sometimes, the simplest and smallest of changes are the ones that will make the biggest impact. Phoenix-based PetSmart’s tetanus program is a perfect example. Because of the nature of its operations, PetSmart employees face significant risk exposure from animal bites. That means that an injured employee might need a tetanus shot in addition to treatment of the wound. As such, every bite, no matter how minor, required an office visit to ensure that the employee’s tetanus status was up-to-date.

But all of that changed when PetSmart began tracking the status of employees’ tetanus shots. With stores armed with that small, but vital piece of information, employees with minor injuries could be treated with standard first aid and sent back to work, with no need for a provider visit. This one small inexpensive change has made a tremendous impact on the company’s bottom line.

At American Infrastructure, one small change that has had a huge impact was a simple color change. As with other companies across a variety of industries, AI’s new employees faced a higher risk of injury than their more experienced counterparts. AI reasoned that ideally, everyone should be looking out for the well-being of new hires, not just their immediate supervisors. But it’s easy to lose track of who’s who on a busy job site. That’s why the company opted to purchase bright green hard hats for new recruits. That way everyone remains constantly aware of the location of employees who might need help, some extra guidance or a safety reminder.

Promising Teddy Award applicant Kimco Staffing of Irvine, Calif., faced a massive obstacle with workers seeking treatment outside of the company’s medical provider networks (MPNs) and receiving excessive and unnecessary treatments. Workers’ comp judges widely disregarded the company’s attempts to enforce its MPN rules if an injured worker claimed to be unaware of the requirement. Kimco took the solid first steps of providing the MPN requirements to each employee, at the time of hire and at the onset of each claim — and requiring employees to acknowledge it in writing. But then the company went one step further, heading off any doubts by taking a picture of each employee holding the signed document. Courts are now more inclined to honor Kimco’s MPN policy, and to release Kimco from the burden of paying for unauthorized treatment.

In addition, companies such as American Infrastructure and PetSmart are also leveraging the power of newer technologies, using iPads for everything from safety module training to capturing pictures of hazards instantly to distributing critical incident metrics to regional and district managers in the field.

Risk & Insurance® congratulates this year’s Teddy Award winners and finalists on their exceptional efforts to create safer workplaces and provide the best possible care for their injured team members.

Michelle Kerr is associate editor of Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

Risk Focus: Cyber

Expanding Cyber BI

Cyber business interruption insurance is a thriving market, but growth carries the threat of a mega-loss. 
By: | March 5, 2018 • 7 min read

Lingering hopes that large-scale cyber attack might be a once-in-a-lifetime event were dashed last year. The four-day WannaCry ransomware strike in May across 150 countries targeted more than 300,000 computers running Microsoft Windows. A month later, NotPetya hit multinationals ranging from Danish shipping firm Maersk to pharmaceutical giant Merck.


Maersk’s chairman, Jim Hagemann Snabe, revealed at this year’s Davos summit that NotPetya shut down most of the group’s network. While it was replacing 45,000 PCs and 4,000 servers, freight transactions had to be completed manually. The combined cost of business interruption and rebuilding the system was up to $300 million.

Merck’s CFO Robert Davis told investors that its NotPetya bill included $135 million in lost sales plus $175 million in additional costs. Fellow victims FedEx and French construction group Saint Gobain reported similar financial hits from lost business and clean-up costs.

The fast-expanding world of cryptocurrencies is also increasingly targeted. Echoes of the 2014 hack that triggered the collapse of Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox emerged this January when Japanese cryptocurrency exchange Coincheck pledged to repay customers $500 million stolen by hackers in a cyber heist.

The size and scope of last summer’s attacks accelerated discussions on both sides of the Atlantic, between risk managers and brokers seeking more comprehensive cyber business interruption insurance products.

It also recently persuaded Pool Re, the UK’s terrorism reinsurance pool set up 25 years ago after bomb attacks in London’s financial quarter, to announce that from April its cover will extend to include material damage and direct BI resulting from acts of terrorism using a cyber trigger.

“The threat from a cyber attack is evident, and businesses have become increasingly concerned about the extensive repercussions these types of attacks could have on them,” said Pool Re’s chief, Julian Enoizi. “This was a clear gap in our coverage which left businesses potentially exposed.”

Shifting Focus

Development of cyber BI insurance to date reveals something of a transatlantic divide, said Hans Allnutt, head of cyber and data risk at international law firm DAC Beachcroft. The first U.S. mainstream cyber insurance products were a response to California’s data security and breach notification legislation in 2003.

Jimaan Sané, technology underwriter, Beazley

Of more recent vintage, Europe’s first cyber policies’ wordings initially reflected U.S. wordings, with the focus on data breaches. “So underwriters had to innovate and push hard on other areas of cyber cover, particularly BI and cyber crimes such as ransomware demands and distributed denial of service attacks,” said Allnut.

“Europe now has regulation coming up this May in the form of the General Data Protection Regulation across the EU, so the focus has essentially come full circle.”

Cyber insurance policies also provide a degree of cover for BI resulting from one of three main triggers, said Jimaan Sané, technology underwriter for specialist insurer Beazley. “First is the malicious-type trigger, where the system goes down or an outage results directly from a hack.

“Second is any incident involving negligence — the so-called ‘fat finger’ — where human or operational error causes a loss or there has been failure to upgrade or maintain the system. Third is any broader unplanned outage that hits either the company or anyone on which it relies, such as a service provider.”

The importance of cyber BI covering negligent acts in addition to phishing and social engineering attacks was underlined by last May’s IT meltdown suffered by airline BA.

This was triggered by a technician who switched off and then reconnected the power supply to BA’s data center, physically damaging servers and distribution panels.

Compensating delayed passengers cost the company around $80 million, although the bill fell short of the $461 million operational error loss suffered by Knight Capital in 2012, which pushed it close to bankruptcy and decimated its share price.

Mistaken Assumption

Awareness of potentially huge BI losses resulting from cyber attack was heightened by well-publicized hacks suffered by retailers such as Target and Home Depot in late 2013 and 2014, said Matt Kletzli, SVP and head of management liability at Victor O. Schinnerer & Company.


However, the incidents didn’t initially alarm smaller, less high-profile businesses, which assumed they wouldn’t be similarly targeted.

“But perpetrators employing bots and ransomware set out to expose any firms with weaknesses in their system,” he added.

“Suddenly, smaller firms found that even when they weren’t themselves targeted, many of those around them had fallen victim to attacks. Awareness started to lift, as the focus moved from large, headline-grabbing attacks to more everyday incidents.”

Publications such as the Director’s Handbook of Cyber-Risk Oversight, issued by the National Association of Corporate Directors and the Internet Security Alliance fixed the issue firmly on boardroom agendas.

“What’s possibly of greater concern is the sheer number of different businesses that can be affected by a single cyber attack and the cost of getting them up and running again quickly.” — Jimaan Sané, technology underwriter, Beazley

Reformed ex-hackers were recruited to offer board members their insights into the most vulnerable points across the company’s systems — in much the same way as forger-turned-security-expert Frank Abagnale Jr., subject of the Spielberg biopic “Catch Me If You Can.”

There also has been an increasing focus on systemic risk related to cyber attacks. Allnutt cites “Business Blackout,” a July 2015 study by Lloyd’s of London and the Cambridge University’s Centre for Risk Studies.

This detailed analysis of what could result from a major cyber attack on America’s power grid predicted a cost to the U.S. economy of hundreds of billions and claims to the insurance industry totalling upwards of $21.4 billion.

Lloyd’s described the scenario as both “technologically possible” and “improbable.” Three years on, however, it appears less fanciful.

In January, the head of the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre, Ciaran Martin, said the UK had been fortunate in so far averting a ‘category one’ attack. A C1 would shut down the financial services sector on which the country relies heavily and other vital infrastructure. It was a case of “when, not if” such an assault would be launched, he warned.

AI: Friend or Foe?

Despite daunting potential financial losses, pioneers of cyber BI insurance such as Beazley, Zurich, AIG and Chubb now see new competitors in the market. Capacity is growing steadily, said Allnutt.

“Not only is cyber insurance a new product, it also offers a new source of premium revenue so there is considerable appetite for taking it on,” he added. “However, whilst most insurers are comfortable with the liability aspects of cyber risk; not all insurers are covering loss of income.”

Matt Kletzli, SVP and head of management liability, Victor O. Schinnerer & Company

Kletzli added that available products include several well-written, broad cyber coverages that take into account all types of potential cyber attack and don’t attempt to limit cover by applying a narrow definition of BI loss.

“It’s a rapidly-evolving coverage — and needs to be — in order to keep up with changing circumstances,” he said.

The good news, according to a Fitch report, is that the cyber loss ratio has been reduced to 45 percent as more companies buy cover and the market continues to expand, bringing down the size of the average loss.

“The bad news is that at cyber events, talk is regularly turning to ‘what will be the Hurricane Katrina-type event’ for the cyber market?” said Kletzli.

“What’s worse is that with hurricane losses, underwriters know which regions are most at risk, whereas cyber is a global risk and insurers potentially face huge aggregation.”


Nor is the advent of robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) necessarily cause for optimism. As Allnutt noted, while AI can potentially be used to decode malware, by the same token sophisticated criminals can employ it to develop new malware and escalate the ‘computer versus computer’ battle.

“The trend towards greater automation of business means that we can expect more incidents involving loss of income,” said Sané. “What’s possibly of greater concern is the sheer number of different businesses that can be affected by a single cyber attack and the cost of getting them up and running again quickly.

“We’re likely to see a growing number of attacks where the aim is to cause disruption, rather than demand a ransom.

“The paradox of cyber BI is that the more sophisticated your organization and the more it embraces automation, the bigger the potential impact when an outage does occur. Those old-fashioned businesses still reliant on traditional processes generally aren’t affected as much and incur smaller losses.” &

Graham Buck is editor of He can be reached at