White Paper
Three Reasons Employers Lack Return-to-Work Programs – and How to Overcome Them
White Paper Summary
An injured worker who is unable to get back on the job quickly suffers several negative consequences. Chief among them is the loss of wages. The loss of productivity and a regular routine can also be damaging to mental health, which further impairs the recovery process.
Employers feel these effects too, with lost productivity and increased costs. Making accommodations and bringing injured workers back on the job with modified duty positions can support the worker’s recovery and improve workers’ comp claim outcomes for employers.
“For the employer, the absence of a coordinated return-to-work system leads to an obvious increase in TTD days. They end up paying employees to be out when they could have had them back functioning as productive team members,” said Aaron Becker, Return-to-Work Team Lead at Broadspire.
“On the claimant side, staying at home can lead to feelings of unproductiveness and frustration with the recovery process. They feel helpless, receiving only a fraction of their usual wages through TTD. Having an advocate on their side and feeling more involved in the process can decrease litigation.”
Given these benefits, why don’t more employers offer robust return-to-work programs?
To learn more about Broadspire, please visit their website.