Point/Counterpoint

Can Cyber Regulations Work?

Can government regulations keep up with changing technologies to control cyber risk?
By: | September 15, 2013 • 4 min read

Point: The Right Cyber Regulation Can Work

Governmental attempts to create cyber security regulations have been a failure thus far, but that doesn’t mean that doing nothing is the proper approach.

Anne Freedman, Senior Editor, Risk & Insurance

Anne Freedman, Senior Editor, Risk & Insurance®

Businesses are more vulnerable than ever to cyber attacks. And it’s clear that effective protection from cyberrisk takes more than individual effort. Attacks by hackers, nation-states and criminal organizations are growing in frequency and sophistication.

But as we can see from the ongoing controversy over the National Security Agency’s data mining efforts, this is an issue that will provoke opposition, even as technology firms and businesses support the effort.

Nevertheless, federal cyber security legislation is necessary to provide a framework that deals with the realities of cyber crime and data breaches.

Enlightened regulation can help mitigate the risk and protect businesses, customers, owners and investors against the impact of catastrophic loss.

There must be public/private sector information sharing and collaboration that protects against cyberrisk without raising privacy fears and civil liberties issues.

Gathering and communicating data at the federal level on viruses, malware and botnets (programs that communicate with other programs to execute malicious software) would be welcomed by all Internet users, commercial and individual.

In addition, it is only the federal government that has the ability to coordinate with other countries to create harmonious cyber crime laws and to cooperate with other countries in cyber investigations.

Instead of trying to pass a massive bill that invades personal and business privacy and mandates specific cyber security practices, regulatory efforts should focus on creating incentives — and offering assistance and guidance — for companies to take the internal steps necessary to protect their organizations.

Such protective steps must work in conjunction with new and developing insurance policies that substantially reduce the financial risk of cyber attacks. Those policies also play a key role in compelling companies to increase their cyber security efforts.

There is no doubt that no matter what steps are taken, cyber criminals will continue to develop new methods of attack. Organizations will continue to be vulnerable to cyberrisk. Only government can create the overarching framework and global collaboration that can lead to better cyber security.

Counterpoint: Cyber Regulation is Next to Impossible

Government regulations on the reporting of cyberrisk in the private sector cannot succeed. It’s not that the government shouldn’t be attempting to protect taxpayers and investors from this risk, because it should. It is right-minded to do so.

PointCounterpoint_Dan

Dan Reynolds, Editor-in-Chief, Risk & Insurance®

Cyber regulation at the national level and the international level is well-intended. But the execution of it is a near-impossible task.

Look at the history of warfare. We have moved from troops standing in line shooting at each other, to cells of hackers operating in cities and towns across the globe.

So how can governments create an international agreement, even if they wanted to? We live in a world where cyber crime is no longer just the province of teenage underground anarchists, or even domestic or foreign organized crime groups. Some governments house hacker cells — affiliated with their own military in some cases — that are carrying out attacks on U.S.-based businesses.

To implement international laws, governments would have to be able to assure the countries that they are negotiating with that they can regulate Internet usage in their own countries. But we know they can’t do that. Some countries don’t even have cyber crime laws on the books yet.

Cyberrisk is a serious issue, but cyber regulation is not the answer. Regulation is deadly slow and not prone to evolve in real-time. It would be handily outpaced by the changing landscape of cyber space and cyber crime, leaving companies strangled by the outdated and ineffective burden of irrelevant mandates.

The worst part of all is that cyber regulation puts the emphasis on compliance rather than the real goal: countering the threat.

The good news is that industry does not have its head in the sand. There are a plethora of organizations working to develop standards and best practices related to cyber security. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) alone has published more than 200 standards for information security. ISO and more than a dozen other international organizations are actively involved in developing and refining a framework of cyber security agreements and standards. These standards-setting bodies are equipped to respond more swiftly than regulators to keep pace with changes.

Government can help protect citizens and businesses from cyberrisk. But that can best be accomplished by partnering with industry and cooperating with the many organizations that are already working to make cyber space a safer place for citizens and for commerce.

PointCounterpoint_Sept15

Editor’s note: The opinions stated in the Zurich Point of Action are provided for informational purposes only and are solely those of Zurich in North America.
The Zurich Point of Action opinions are not legal advice and Zurich assumes no liability concerning the information above. The Point and Counterpoint opinions are those of Risk & Insurance® and are completely independent of Zurich.

Anne Freedman is managing editor of Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

The Risk List: Presented by Travelers

6 Risks for the Construction Industry

Drag and drop the tiles below to arrange them in your prefered order of most concerning risk (#1) to least concerning risk (#6). Then press "Submit Rankings" to see the summary results.

1
Shifting Workforce
2
Construction Defect
3
Contractual Risk
4
Overextension
5
Fire
6
Site Protection