Disability

VR in Workers’ Comp

Health care researchers and workers’ comp insurers are discovering the versatility in virtual reality as a new tool for treating patients and training workers.
By: | February 20, 2017 • 5 min read

Virtual reality is fast becoming a useful new workers’ compensation tool.

Health care researchers are testing novel ways to incorporate VR into patient rehabilitation while workers’ comp insurers are using it to better train adjusters and underwriters.

Areas where the application has promise include catastrophic injuries such as spinal cord injuries, phantom limb pain after amputation, severe pain after burns and rehabilitation.

“The industry is starting to use it,” said Zack Craft, vice president, rehab solutions, at One Call Care Management. “It’s being discussed at almost every rehab center out there.

Zack Craft, vice president, rehab solutions, One Call Care Management

“They see workers’ comp as a good area to test the waters; they see this as a funded source,” he said.

So how does a video image displayed on a large screen or headset help treat catastrophic injuries?

VR may help injured employees cope with pain and regain mobility after serious accidents. VR therapy may improve balance and help with motor learning and mobility. Incorporating video games with the therapy might also keep patients engaged and interested in rehabilitation for longer.

Treatment can be individually designed per patient based on the injury.  Biometrics can measure and adjust to how quickly patients are recovering. The development of the technology, though, is still nascent.

“I think we’re still years away from decent guidelines on which technology to use on certain conditions and for how long and what outcomes we can expect,” said Dr. Robert Goldberg, chief medical officer at Healthesystems.

Doctors tried VR in a study to determine if the technology can help in pain relief while changing bandages on significant burns. Results from the first group of patients were promising.

One of the most exciting potential areas for workers’ compensation payers is the way VR might also be used to replace or reduce opioids in the treatment of pain.

Advertisement




Opioids are a huge cost for payers. That’s because the drugs are so widely prescribed, are addictive and prescription coverage for them can continue for years without remedy.

It is thought VR can help divert the injured worker’s thoughts away from lingering pain and reduce use of addictive painkillers.

“We’re on the cusp of something almost revolutionary if they can manage chronic pain,” Craft said.

“We need to show that the technology works in a way that makes financial sense.” — Zack Craft, vice president, rehab solutions, One Call Care Management

“When your brain is distracted and immersed into a full-body sensory experience it doesn’t focus on pain,” he added.

VR might also offer improved mirroring, a technique already used to help with phantom limb pain. Again, the VR display distracts the patient from focusing on the nerve-ending pain. That may help to rewire the brain to sense less pain and begin to recognize the missing limb.

Currently, VR is most commonly applied to the care of mental health conditions such as depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, autism and ADHD.

Far from the doctor’s office, VR is already playing a big role in workers’ comp as a training tool for employees, underwriters and adjusters, said Mahendra Nambiar, vice president of global insurance solutions and innovations lead at Capgemini.

“The No. 1 way we see VR used in workers’ comp is from the training space,” Nambiar said.

VR can be used to better train workers, such as a forklift operator, how to do a job more safely and avoid injuries, he said. It can also help the adjuster or underwriter learn to do a more consistent job when conducting a workers’ comp safety assessment.

“The uniformity and quality and inspection goes way higher” when VR is used for training, Nambiar said. VR training is often easier and cheaper than instructor-led teaching, he added.

There’s Promise to the Technology

Healthesystems’ Goldberg said he is hopeful about new uses for treating injured employees.

Dr. Robert Goldberg, chief medical officer, Healthesystems

“There’s promise to this technology,” he said.

Yet, there’s reason for concern.

Last year, the Federal Trade Commission fined the creators of the Lumosity “brain training” programs $2 million for deceiving consumers with marketing claims that their games can help users perform better at work and school, and reduce or delay cognitive impairment associated with age.

“Lumosity preyed on consumers’ fears about age-related cognitive decline, suggesting their games could stave off memory loss, dementia, and even Alzheimer’s disease,” said Jessica Rich, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection in a statement.

“But Lumosity simply did not have the science to back up its ads.”

Virtual reality can best be used as medical treatment when evidence-based care is already established, said Skip Rizzo, the director of medical virtual reality at the Institute for Creative Technologies at the University of Southern California, in Playa Vista, Calif.

For example, mirroring is already proven to help patients with phantom limb pain by using a real mirror. VR is simply a new tool to improve on the proven technique.

One Call is looking at ways to measure different outcomes when using VR, such as quality of life improvements, cost and clinical outcomes. The company is also developing ways to track and develop its own VR data.

“We need to show that the technology works in a way that makes financial sense,” Craft said.

The Cost of the Technology and the Treatment

According to a “2016 Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research Report,” the virtual reality and augmented reality market could reach $80 billion in revenue by 2025. Its use in health care alone could generate $5.1 billion in sales.

“Looking beyond video games, we see real estate, retail and healthcare among the first markets that VR/AR disrupts,” Goldman Sachs said in the report.

Advertisement




“I think you’ll see it impacting claims this year,” Craft said. “Over the next one to two years I can’t even image where we’ll be with it.”

Goldberg expects workers’ comp payers will probably decide each case individually.

“I don’t think they are going to hold back on new technology scripts,” Craft said.  Some insurers are going to be very willing to approve scripts on VR rather than opioids, he said.

The challenge pertains more to the cost of VR’s technology than its medical value. Carriers will need to understand how to vet VR products, and recurring costs.

The technology may become obsolete more quickly than expected and there are other data costs that may make it difficult for adjusters and case managers to gauge the projected cost of the equipment for each claim.

The good news is that the cost of the VR technology is falling.

“It’s exciting because every day there’s new technology,” Craft said. “It’s no longer in the future; it’s here.” &

Juliann Walsh is a staff writer at Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

Emerging Risks

Stadium Safety

Soft targets, such as sports stadiums, must increase measures to protect lives and their business.
By: | January 10, 2018 • 8 min read

Acts of violence and terror can break out in even the unlikeliest of places.

Look at the 2013 Boston Marathon, where two bombs went off, killing three and injuring dozens of others in a terrorist attack. Or consider the Orlando Pulse nightclub, where 49 people were killed and 58 wounded. Most recently in Las Vegas, a gunman killed 58 and injured hundreds of others.

Advertisement




The world is not inherently evil, but these evil acts still find a way into places like churches, schools, concerts and stadiums.

“We didn’t see these kinds of attacks 20 years ago,” said Glenn Chavious, managing director, global sports & recreation practice leader, Industria Risk & Insurance Services.

As a society, we have advanced through technology, he said. Technology’s platform has enabled the message of terror to spread further faster.

“But it’s not just with technology. Our cultures, our personal grievances, have brought people out of their comfort zones.”

Chavious said that people still had these grievances 20 years ago but were less likely to act out. Tech has linked people around the globe to other like-minded individuals, allowing for others to join in on messages of terror.

“The progression of terrorist acts over the last 10 years has very much been central to the emergence of ‘lone wolf’ actors. As was the case in both Manchester and Las Vegas, the ‘lone wolf’ dynamic presents an altogether unique set of challenges for law enforcement and event service professionals,” said John

Glenn Chavious, managing director, global sports & recreation practice leader, Industria Risk & Insurance Services

Tomlinson, senior vice president, head of entertainment, Lockton.

As more violent outbreaks take place in public spaces, risk managers learn from and better understand what attackers want. Each new event enables risk managers to see what works and what can be improved upon to better protect people and places.

But the fact remains that the nature and pattern of attacks are changing.

“Many of these actions are devised in complete obscurity and on impulse, and are carried out by individuals with little to no prior visibility, in terms of behavioral patterns or threat recognition, thus making it virtually impossible to maintain any elements of anticipation by security officials,” said Tomlinson.

With vehicles driving into crowds, active shooters and the random nature of attacks, it’s hard to gauge what might come next, said Warren Harper, global sports & events practice leader, Marsh.

Public spaces like sporting arenas are particularly vulnerable because they are considered ‘soft targets.’ They are areas where people gather in large numbers for recreation. They are welcoming to their patrons and visitors, much like a hospital, and the crowds that attend come in droves.

NFL football stadiums, for example, can hold anywhere from 25,000 to 93,000 people at maximum capacity — and that number doesn’t include workers, players or other behind-the-scenes personnel.

“Attacks are a big risk management issue,” said Chavious. “Insurance is the last resort we want to rely upon. We’d rather be preventing it to avoid such events.”

Preparing for Danger

The second half of 2017 proved a trying few months for the insurance industry, facing hurricanes, earthquakes, wildfires and — unfortunately — multiple mass shootings.

The industry was estimated to take a more than $1 billion hit from the Las Vegas massacre in October 2017. A few years back, the Boston Marathon bombings cost businesses around $333 million each day the city was shut down following the attack. Officials were on a manhunt for the suspects in question, and Boston was on lockdown.

“Many of these actions are devised in complete obscurity and on impulse, and are carried out by individuals with little to no prior visibility.” — John Tomlinson, senior vice president, head of entertainment, Lockton

“Fortunately, we have not had a complete stadium go down,” said Harper. But a mass casualty event at a stadium can lead to the death or injury of athletes, spectators and guests; psychological trauma; potential workers’ comp claims from injured employees; lawsuits; significant reputational damage; property damage and prolonged business interruption losses.

The physical damage, said Harper, might be something risk managers can gauge beforehand, but loss of life is immeasurable.

Advertisement




The best practice then, said Chavious, is awareness and education.

“A lot of preparedness comes from education. [Stadiums] need a risk management plan.”

First and foremost, Chavious said, stadiums need to perform a security risk assessment. Find out where vulnerable spots are, decide where education can be improved upon and develop other safety measures over time.

Areas outside the stadium are soft targets, said Harper. The parking lot, the ticketing and access areas and even the metro transit areas where guests mingle before and after a game are targeted more often than inside.

Last year, for example, a stadium in Manchester was the target of a bomb, which detonated outside the venue as concert-goers left. In 2015, the Stade de France in Paris was the target of suicide bombers and active shooters, who struck the outside of the stadium while a soccer match was held inside.

Security, therefore, needs to be ready to react both inside and outside the vicinity. Reviewing past events and seeing what works has helped risk mangers improve safety strategies.

“A lot of places are getting into table-top exercises” to make sure their people are really trained, added Harper.

In these exercises, employees from various departments come together to brainstorm and work through a hypothetical terrorist situation.

A facilitator will propose the scenario — an active shooter has been spotted right before the game begins, someone has called in a bomb threat, a driver has fled on foot after driving into a crowd — and the stadium’s staff is asked how they should respond.

“People tend to act on assumptions, which may be wrong, but this is a great setting for them to brainstorm and learn,” said Harper.

Technology and Safety

In addition to education, stadiums are ahead of the game, implementing high-tech security cameras and closed-circuit TV monitoring, requiring game-day audiences to use clear/see-through bags when entering the arena, upping employee training on safety protocols and utilizing vapor wake dogs.

Drones are also adding a protective layer.

John Tomlinson, senior vice president, head of entertainment, Lockton

“Drones are helpful in surveying an area and can alert security to any potential threat,” said Chavious.

“Many stadiums have an area between a city’s metro and the stadium itself. If there’s a disturbance there, and you don’t have a camera in that area, you could use the drone instead of moving physical assets.”

Chavious added that “the overhead view will pick up potential crowd concentration, see if there are too many people in one crowd, or drones can fly overhead and be used to assess situations like a vehicle that’s in a place it shouldn’t be.”

But like with all new technology, drones too have their downsides. There’s the expense of owning, maintaining and operating the drone. Weather conditions can affect how and when a drone is used, so it isn’t a reliable source. And what if that drone gets hacked?

“The evolution of venue security protocols most certainly includes the increased usage of unmanned aerial systems (UAS), including drones, as the scope and territorial vastness provided by UAS, from a monitoring perspective, is much more expansive than ground-based apparatus,” said Tomlinson.

“That said,” he continued, “there have been many documented instances in which the intrusion of unauthorized drones at live events have posed major security concerns and have actually heightened the risk of injury to participants and attendees.”

Still, many experts, including Tomlinson, see drones playing a significant role in safety at stadiums moving forward.

“I believe the utilization of drones will continue to be on the forefront of risk mitigation innovation in the live event space, albeit with some very tight operating controls,” he said.

The SAFETY Act

In response to the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, U.S. Homeland Security enacted the Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective

Warren Harper, global sports & events practice leader, Marsh

Technologies Act (SAFETY Act).

The primary purpose of the SAFETY Act was to encourage potential manufacturers or sellers of anti-terrorism technologies to continue to develop and commercialize these technologies (like video monitoring or drones).

There was a worry that the threat of liability in such an event would deter and prevent sellers from pursing these technologies, which are aimed at saving lives. Instead, the SAFETY Act provides incentive by adding a system of risk and litigation management.

“[The SAFETY Act] is geared toward claims arising out of acts of terrorism,” said Harper.

Bottom line: It’s added financial protection. Businesses both large and small can apply for the SAFETY designation — in fact, many NFL teams push for the designation. So far, four have reached SAFETY certification: Lambeau Field, MetLife Stadium, University of Phoenix Stadium and Gillette Stadium.

Advertisement




To become certified, reviewers with the SAFETY Act assess stadiums for their compliance with the most up-to-date terrorism products. They look at their built-in emergency response plans, cyber security measures, hiring and training of employees, among other criteria.

The process can take over a year, but once certified, stadiums benefit because liability for an event is lessened. One thing to remember, however, is that the added SAFETY Act protection only holds weight when a catastrophic event is classified as an act of terrorism.

“Generally speaking, I think the SAFETY Act has been instrumental in paving the way for an accelerated development of anti-terrorism products and services,” said Tomlinson.

“The benefit of gaining elements of impunity from third-party liability related matters has served as a catalyst for developers to continue to push the envelope, so to speak, in terms of ideas and innovation.”

So while attackers are changing their methods and trying to stay ahead of safety protocols at stadiums, the SAFETY Act, as well as risk managers and stadium owners, keep stadiums investing in newer, more secure safety measures. &

Autumn Heisler is a staff writer at Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]