Column: Workers' Comp

Disquiet on the Workers’ Comp Front

By: | July 6, 2017 • 3 min read
Roberto Ceniceros is senior editor at Risk & Insurance® and chair of the National Workers' Compensation and Disability Conference® & Expo. He can be reached at [email protected] Read more of his columns and features.

With the Affordable Care Act’s fate tied to Washington politics, it must be challenging for workers’ compensation insurers and anyone else needing a longer-term view of how claim expenses will trend.


Perhaps one of the biggest challenges is the unknown of how any changes to the ACA will impact the number of Americans able to purchase health coverage.

In an April commentary, Phil Kalin, CEO of Colorado’s Pinnacol Assurance, warned that business leaders in his state “regardless of their opinions on the ACA — should be aware of how its dismantling could slow a favorable trend for their work comp costs.”

His premise: a lack of health insurance leads to more claim shifting onto workers’ comp.

Before joining Pinnacol, a state-chartered workers’ comp insurer, Kalin served as CEO of the Denver-based Center for Improving Value in Health Care, an organization supporting moving away from fee-for-service health care to quality care. He has also served in hospital system senior-management roles. It makes sense he would opine on how shifts in health insurance coverage will impact worker’s comp costs.

The uncertainties of Washington and health care insurance’s future make it even more imperative to bet on the certainty of strategies that embody proven risk management concepts.

Workers’ comp claims and costs have slowed in recent years as more Americans obtained health insurance, Kalin wrote. He supports his premise by citing statistics from Colorado and other states showing “there is a clear association” between more Americans covered by health insurance and a decline in workers’ comp claims.

From 2010 to 2016 medical only claims insured by Pinnacol dropped 28 percent. Although other factors played a role, Kalin believes the ACA’s impact was significant.

Similarly, a Fitch Ratings report released in May stated that workers’ comp has been a bright spot among commercial lines insurance with the line exhibiting combined ratios of 95 percent in 2015 and 2016. Employment growth, stable claims trends and macroeconomic improvements contributed to workers’ compensation’s profitability.

“Implementation of the Affordable Care Act and a corresponding shift of individual medical care delivery away from workers’ compensation to other markets may also be a factor that bears further study,” Fitch’s report stated.

By contrast, information released nearly two years ago by the venerable Workers’ Compensation Research Institute forecasted that “case shifting” caused by the ACA could migrate hundreds of millions of dollars in costs from group health onto workers’ compensation.

The premise: The ACA’s capitation of medical provider reimbursement would encourage doctors to find more injuries to be work related so they could tap into more lucrative worker’s comp medical care payments.

That prognosis, right or wrong, was made in 2015 when the ACA enjoyed President Barrack Obama’s protection, making its future seem more certain.

Now, as I write this column, the ACA’s future is in the hands of a Republican president and Republican-dominated Congress that are searching for a way to deliver on campaign promises of eliminating the ACA and finding a replacement.

What that replacement would look like, if indeed it comes about, remains a big mystery, especially with the Republicans crafting legislation out of public view.


That makes it impossible to venture a guess on how any new legislation might impact workers’ comp claims and expenses. Add in the normal uncertainties of making such forecasts, even when information is readily available, and you get a very difficult environment for predicting the impact on a line of insurance with a long tail exposed to medical inflation.

“We are sitting here with bated breath,” a Pinnacol spokeswoman told me.

The rest of us will have to join her.

Meanwhile, there are the risk management fundamentals we know consistently work no matter the political landscape. They are the investments and actions good risk managers and insurers can engage in to improve operations overall.

They are the things that always reduce costs, like driving accident rates even lower, immediately getting injured workers quality medical care, and fortifying return-to-work efforts.

The uncertainties of Washington and health care insurance’s future make it even more imperative to bet on the certainty of strategies that embody proven risk management concepts.

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

Risk Management

The Profession

Janet Sheiner, VP of risk management and real estate at AMN Healthcare Services Inc., sees innovation as an answer to fast-evolving and emerging risks.
By: | March 5, 2018 • 4 min read

R&I: What was your first job?

As a kid, bagging groceries. My first job out of school, part-time temp secretary.

R&I: How did you come to work in risk management?

Risk management picks you; you don’t necessarily pick it. I came into it from a regulatory compliance angle. There’s a natural evolution because a lot of your compliance activities also have the effect of managing your risk.

R&I: What is the risk management community doing right?


There’s much benefit to grounding strategic planning in an ERM framework. That’s a great innovation in the industry, to have more emphasis on ERM. I also think that risk management thought leaders are casting themselves more as enablers of business, not deterrents, a move in the right direction.

R&I: What could the risk management community be doing a better job of?

Justified or not, risk management functions are often viewed as the “Department of No.” We’ve worked hard to cultivate a reputation as the “Department of Maybe,” so partners across the organization see us as business enablers. That reputation has meant entertaining some pretty crazy ideas, but our willingness to try and find a way to “yes” tempered with good risk management has made all the difference.

Janet Sheiner, VP, Risk Management & Real Estate, AMN Healthcare Services Inc.

R&I: What was the best location and year for the RIMS conference and why?

San Diego, of course!  America’s Finest City has the infrastructure, Convention Center, hotels, airport and public transportation — plus you can’t beat our great weather! The restaurant scene is great, not to mention those beautiful coastal views.

R&I: What’s been the biggest change in the risk management and insurance industry since you’ve been in it?

The emergence of risk management as a distinct profession, with four-year degree programs and specific academic curriculum. Now I have people on my team who say their goal is to be a risk manager. I said before that risk management picks you, but we’re getting to a point where people pick it.

R&I: What emerging commercial risk most concerns you?


The commercial insurance market’s ability to innovate to meet customer demand. Businesses need to innovate to stay relevant, and the commercial market needs to innovate with us.  Carriers have to be willing to take on more risk and potentially take a loss to meet the unique and evolving risks companies are facing.

R&I: Of which insurance carrier do you have the highest opinion?

Beazley. They have been an outstanding partner to AMN. They are responsive, flexible and reasonable.  They have evolved with us. They have an appreciation for risk management practices we’ve organically woven into our business, and by extension, this makes them more comfortable with taking on new risks with us.

R&I: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the U.S. health care industry and why?

I am very optimistic about the health care industry. We have an aging population with burgeoning health care needs, coupled with a decreasing supply of health care providers — that means we have to get smarter about how we manage health care. There’s a lot of opportunity for thought leaders to fill that gap.

R&I: Who is your mentor and why?

Professionally, AMN Healthcare General Counsel, Denise Jackson, has enabled me to do the best work I’ve ever done, and better than I thought I could do.  Personally, my husband Andrew, a second-grade teacher, who has a way of putting things into a human perspective.

R&I: What have you accomplished that you are proudest of?

In my early 20s, I set a goal for the “corner office.” I achieved that when I became vice president.  I received a ‘Values in Practice’ award for trust at AMN. The nomination came from team members I work with every day, and I was incredibly humbled and honored.

R&I: What is your favorite book or movie?

The noir genre, so anything by Raymond Chandler in books. For movies,  “Double Indemnity,” the 1944 Billy Wilder classic, with insurance at the heart of it!

R&I: What is your favorite drink?


Clean water. Check out for how to help people enjoy clean, safe water.

R&I: What’s the best restaurant at which you’ve eaten?

Liqun Roast Duck Restaurant in Beijing.

R&I: What is the most unusual/interesting place you have ever visited?

China. See favorite restaurant above. This restaurant had been open for 100 years in that location. It didn’t exactly have an “A” rating, and it was probably not a place most risk managers would go to.

R&I: What is the riskiest activity you ever engaged in?

Eating that duck at Liqun!

R&I: If the world has a modern hero, who is it and why?

Dr. Seuss who, in response to a 1954 report in Life magazine, worked to reduce illiteracy among school children by making children’s books more interesting. His work continues to educate and entertain children worldwide.

R&I: What do your friends and family think you do?

They’re not really sure!

Katie Dwyer is an associate editor at Risk & Insurance®. She can be reached at [email protected]