Reputational Risk

Claims and Culture

Unchecked sexual harassment in the workplace can lead to millions in losses, tarnish brands, and erode customer and employee trust.
By: | October 3, 2017 • 9 min read

For the past year, Fox News appeared to spend as much time making news as it did reporting it. Lurid accounts of sexual harassment involving the late CEO Roger Ailes and on-air host Bill O’Reilly alienated advertisers, stained the network’s reputation, and continue to cost 21st Century Fox millions on a quarterly basis.

Advertisement




Additional firings and suspensions this summer of top personnel — also for sexual harassment — suggest that Fox’s problems are not yet in the rear view mirror.

In February, Uber stole some of the spotlight from Fox after a female former employee published a startling blog post laying bare the company’s “bro culture” where sexual harassment and discrimination were allowed to flourish.

Uber has since fired more than 20 employees, some of them senior executives, and 40 additional employees were reprimanded or referred to counseling and training. CEO Travis Kalanick was forced to step down in June.

The highly public nature of Uber’s and Fox’s woes is atypical. Approximately 15,000 sexual harassment cases are brought to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) each year. Those found to be viable are often settled quietly, but at no small expense to the company, said Chris Williams, employment practices liability product manager for Travelers.

Susan Strauss, principal, Strauss Consulting

Cases that reach a jury pose a new level of risk. Public disclosure of emails, voicemails or other communications can be “tremendously embarrassing” for the company, said Williams, and there is also a trend toward juries wanting to punish companies that are aware of sexual harassment issues but failed to take any action.

“Whether it goes to court or not it still impacts their bottom line,” said consultant and trainer Susan Strauss, an expert in workplace harassment and bullying. “Morale drops, productivity drops and absenteeism increases. Employees tend to suffer from an increase in the amount of physical ailments — everything from colds to GI problems to heart attacks and migraine headaches.”

There can be severe psychological ramifications for the victims, she added, including depression and suicidal feelings. Some victims might need to take FMLA leave, or might require accommodation under the ADA.

All of which impacts the culture and productivity of the organization, she said. “If word gets out … then they’ve got a poor reputation out in the community and within their industry. It’s just bad all over. Then the employees wonder why isn’t management doing something about it. There’s a loss of trust.”

The potential for this level of damage, said Williams, should serve as incentive to put risk management strategies and techniques in place.

Many Remain Uncovered

Employment practices liability insurance can help defray the cost of legal defense as well as costs related to judgments or settlements, making it an ideal solution for any company that would be hard-pressed to pay such costs out of pocket. Yet take-up on EPLI remains moderate.

Gross written premium for EPLI in 2015 was $2.1 billion, according to MarketStance, despite a 2003 Best’s Review prediction that the EPLI market would grow to around $7 billion “in the next few years.”

“Insurers, generally speaking, choose very good lawyers to defend cases. But oftentimes in these high stakes situations, they aren’t the firm that the client wants.” — Bill Boeck, senior vice president, Insurance and Claims Counsel for Lockton

Growth of the segment has slowed, partially due to some of the available premium shifting into bundled management liability policies that include EPLI as well as D&O and other coverages. A main point of concern is that 60 percent of non-buyers mistakenly assume their EPL risks are protected under other policies, according to Gen Re.

Larger employers, and those with the most insurance savvy, are significantly more likely to transfer their EPL risks than smaller employers, even though small to mid-sized employers stand to suffer more in the face of a hefty judgement or settlement.

Advertisement




“If you think about the cost of one settlement or even trying one of these cases, it’s not uncommon for the legal fees to go up to $250,000 or more,” said Williams.

“And then if you lose, you’re also responsible for the plaintiff attorney’s fees. So I think a key risk management strategy really does have to be an employment practices liability policy.”

EPLI premiums are based on a variety of factors, including company size, industry, and location. But underwriters also want to know what the company’s policy on sexual harassment is, and what procedures are in place to enforce that policy. A robust reporting process is vital, as well as a swift and transparent investigation procedure that ensures a resolution.

Some situations can be resolved by coaching the harasser, but some situations require that the harasser be terminated because the conduct is simply unacceptable, said Williams.

“What an underwriter needs to see if it’s a good risk, is the culture of the company, the weight given to their employment policies and procedures, and how seriously they take the investigation and reporting of any sort of incidents or claims,” said Edward McNally, Chief Underwriting Officer, Lockton Affinity.

Edward McNally, Chief Underwriting Officer, Lockton Affinity

Underwriters may apply other tools, including data from EEOC reporting forms. Employee comments on sites like glassdoor.com can also provide insight into how the company operates behind closed doors.

“It’s really hard, as an underwriting organization to get at the corporate culture through just a paper application,” said Williams.

One issue risk managers may want to raise while negotiating an EPLI policy is the selection of counsel, said Bill Boeck, senior vice president, Insurance and Claims Counsel for Lockton.

In a high stakes EPL event, he said, “many clients are very concerned about having exactly the right lawyer defending the claim.” But EPL policies often give the insurer the ability to select defense counsel.

“Insurers, generally speaking, choose very good lawyers to defend cases. But oftentimes in these high stakes situations, they aren’t the firm that the client wants.”

Don’t wait until a claim occurs to raise the issue, Boeck cautioned. Once the policy has been triggered, “the insurer will enforce whatever right it has.”

Additional Coverage

In an age of social media hyperfocus and boycott campaigns run by hashtag, risk managers should certainly be thinking about how a sexual harassment claim could impact their organization.

“You’re not only worried about the claim itself you’re worried about what it’s going to do to your business. Is it going to lead people to stop doing business with the company?” said Boeck. “People decide ‘I don’t like what Uber’s doing so I’m going to use Lyft.’ All of a sudden Uber’s business falls off.

Is there something a good company can do to recover from that? The answer is yes — there may be possible solutions,” he said, referring specifically to reputational risk coverage.

“If I feel like my senior executives or my board are really worried about reputational damage that flows from something like this, then that’s something I would want to explore.”

The coverage can be expensive, and laborious to underwrite, Boeck said. But for some companies, it may make good financial sense.

“A good policy is always going to be a bespoke policy,” he said. “It’s going to be custom designed for a particular client.

Training and Measuring

Experts unanimously agreed that training is the best preventive strategy to minimize the risk of claims as well as improve an organization’s risk profile. But companies that try to get by doing the bare minimum won’t be doing themselves any favors, said Strauss.

Advertisement




Too many companies, she said, expect HR to handle training internally, even if the staff aren’t trained in the subject. Worse, some rely on one-size-fits-all online training that has no effect.

“You have to do more than online training — that really doesn’t work … it’s the same old boring stuff and it might only focus on the legalese and not the practicality. It’s got to be good training, by somebody that knows what they’re doing.”

Strauss recommends a half-day training session for employees and a full day for management. Managers need guidance on what ethical and legal responsibilities are, she said. And “they need to be trained in how to intervene. They need to be able to recognize some of the more subtle, nuanced forms of harassment and know how to confront it when they see it.”

Carrie Kurzon, National EPLI Product Manager at The Hartford, concurred that insurers are paying attention to clients’ training initiatives.

“Companies that conduct management-level training to ensure that internal complaints are processed appropriately and in compliance with articulated policies would tend to be more favorable accounts for insurers,” she said.

“Training is not just once, added Strauss. “It’s got to be ongoing. And you don’t do the same training year after year, you add different aspects to it.”

But Strauss stressed that training is only one piece of the pie, especially for any company with an unfavorable EPL loss history.

“The big first step is to recognize that the problem exists and then to define it,” said Strauss. “They have to be open to acknowledging the culture and that’s a hard thing to do in and of itself.”

Strauss suggests creating a task force comprised of people across the organization — from maintenance engineers all the way up to the corner office. The task force can conduct a baseline survey including interviews, in order to assess the scope of the problems and the obstacles to eliminating those problems.

Lockton Affinity’s McNally added that a thorough audit of company data can be an essential tool to identify those problems.

“A lot of companies don’t engage in this behavior of statistical analysis within the HR practices. You do a lot of auditing of everything else within your business, but HR’s kind of left out of that loop.”

“While it is impossible to prevent a sexual harassment claim from being filed, by focusing on preparation and protection, risk managers can reduce the likelihood of such a claim and mitigate long-term impacts such as costly litigation.” — Carrie Kurzon, National EPLI Product Manager, The Hartford

Assessing the company’s employment claims and litigation statistics as compared to national data is one way to spot patterns and anomalies, suggested McNally. It can be telling if claims coming from any particular class of people are out of proportion with the larger picture of where claims are coming from.

“You’re boiling a very human condition down to the math,” said McNally. But it will help to isolate trends that need to be unpacked and understood.

“That high level of statistical awareness of the claims that you’re getting and the settlement rates, against the general market, would be a huge benefit to risk managers,” he said. “And I think it would also drive that conversation that’s lacking for a lot of companies — where the human resource department and the legal department and the risk management department aren’t necessarily wholly tied into each other [with regard to] employment litigation.”

Advertisement




Armed with that knowledge, “establish a strategic plan,” said Strauss. That plan should include goals and measurable objectives that can be monitored, especially throughout the first year.

Travelers’ Williams said that a couple of decades ago, he would have predicted that by now, corporate America would’ve figured out how not to have these claims. “I’ve done a 180 on that; and I don’t think we’ll ever eradicate them.” That’s because there’s never going to be a way to control every interaction between employees on the shop or office floor, he said.

“While it is impossible to prevent a sexual harassment claim from being filed,” said Kurzon, “by focusing on preparation and protection, risk managers can reduce the likelihood of such a claim and mitigate long-term impacts such as costly litigation.”&

Michelle Kerr is associate editor of Risk & Insurance. She can be reached at [email protected]

More from Risk & Insurance

More from Risk & Insurance

Business Interruption Risk

Hidden Risks of Violence

The Las Vegas shooting and other tragedies increase demand for non-physical damage BI coverages. The market is growing, but do new products meet companies’ new needs?
By: | December 14, 2017 • 5 min read

Mass shootings in the United States and the emergence of new forms of terrorism in Europe are boosting demand for insurance against losses caused by business interruption when a policyholder suffers no direct property damage, according to insurers.

Advertisement




But brokers say coverage for non-physical damage BI (NDBI), needs to evolve to better meet the emerging needs of corporate clients.

For years, manufacturing clients sought a more comprehensive range of NDBI coverages, especially due to the indirect effects of natural catastrophes such as the Thai floods that disrupted global supply chains in 2011.

More recently, however, hospitality and entertainment companies are expressing interest as they strive to adapt to realities such as the mass shootings in tourism hotspots Las Vegas and Orlando and terror attacks in such popular destinations as New York, Paris, Berlin, Barcelona and London.

In addition to loss of life and property, revenue loss is a real risk. Tragedies that cause a high number of fatalities can cause severe financial losses, especially for companies relying on tourism, as visitors shy away from crime scenes.

Precedents already exist. Paris received 1.5 million fewer visitors than expected in 2016, after the French capital was targeted by a series of deadly terror attacks the year before.

More recently, bookings declined in the immediate aftermath of a shooting at the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino in Las Vegas that took the lives of 58 people on October 1: Bookings at the hotel have since recovered.

Joey Sylvester, national director of operations & planning, Public Sector, Gallagher

“The recent horrific mass shootings in Las Vegas, Nev., and in Sutherland Springs, Texas, raised awareness and concerns about similar events occurring in areas where the public congregates, such as entertainment venues like sporting events, concerts, restaurants, movie theaters, convention centers and more,” said Bob Nusslein, head of Innovative Risk Solutions Americas, Swiss Re CS.

“The second highest NDBI cover to natural catastrophes is terrorism, including active shooter and mass shootings.”

However, products available in the market do not always provide the protection companies would like. Active shooter coverages, for example, focus mostly on third-party liabilities that policyholders may face after a shooting.

Loss-of-attraction policies often define triggering events with a high degree of detail. These events may need to be characterized as a terrorist attack or act of war by authorities. In some cases, access to the venue needs to be officially cut off by police.

It follows that an attack by a 64-year old ex-accountant who shoots hundreds of people for no apparent reason — as was the case in the Mandalay Bay tragedy — isn’t likely to align with a typical policy trigger.

But insurers say they are trying to adapt to the evolving realities of both mass shootings and terrorism to meet the new needs expressed by clients.

“The active shooting coverage is drawing much interest in the U.S. market right now. In Europe, clients are increasingly inquiring about loss of attraction,” said Chris Parker, head of terrorism and political violence, Beazley.

“What we are doing at the moment is to try and cross these two kinds of products, so that a client can get coverage for the loss of attraction resulting from an active shooting event.”

Loss-of-attraction policies cover revenue loss derived from catastrophic events, and underwriters already offer alternatives that provide coverage, even when no property damage is involved.

To establish the reach of such a policy, buyers can define a trigger radius — a physical area defined in the policy. If a catastrophic event takes place within this radius, coverage will be triggered. This practice is sometimes called “cat in a box.”

Some products specify locations that, if hit by a catastrophic event, will result in lost revenue for the insured. For resorts or large entertainment complexes, for example, attacks on nearby airports could cause significant loss of revenue and could be covered by NDBI insurance.

Measuring losses is a challenge, and underwriters may demand steep retention levels. According to Parker, excess coverage may kick in after a 20 percent to 25 percent revenue drop.

Insurers will also want proof that the drop is related to the catastrophic event rather than economic downturn, seasonal variances or other factors.

“Capacity is very large for direct acts of terrorism but lower for indirect terrorism and violent acts because the exposure is far greater,” said Joey Sylvester, national director of operations & planning, Public Sector, Gallagher.

“Commercial businesses, public entities, religious and nonprofit organizations have various needs for this type of coverage, and the appetite is certainly trending upward.”

It is difficult to foresee which events will cause business disruption. As a result, according to Nusslein, companies generally prefer to purchase all-risk NDBI covers rather than named-perils coverage.

“The main reason is that, if they have coverage for four potential NDBI events and a fifth event occurs, the fifth event is not covered,” he said. “Insurers, new to NDBI covers, still prefer named-perils covers over all-risk cover.”

Current geopolitical tensions are also fueling buyers’ demands.

“Many companies want nuclear, biochemical, chemical and radiological exclusions removed from terrorism NDBI covers. While this is more difficult for insurers, it is not impossible,” Nusslein said.

“War risk NDBI cover is becoming more sought after due to political tensions between the U.S. and North Korea.”

“Many companies want nuclear, biochemical, chemical and radiological exclusions removed from terrorism NDBI covers. While this is more difficult for insurers, it is not impossible.” — Bob Nusslein, head of Innovative Risk Solutions Americas, Swiss Re CS

Natural catastrophes still constitute the largest share of perils underlying NDBI products.  Parametric indexes are increasingly employed to provide uncontroversial triggers to policies, said Duncan Ellis, U.S. property practice leader, Marsh.

These indexes range from rainfall levels and wind speed to the measured intensity of earthquakes. Interest in this kind of NDBI coverage expanded after the recent hurricane season.

Advertisement




“The benefit of these products is that you do not have to go through the settlement process, which clients hate,” Ellis said.

NDBI policies are often bespoke, which is more common for very large insurance buyers.

“Usually, the market offers bespoke coverages for individual industries or clients, with very significant deductibles,” said Tim Cracknell, partner,  JLT Specialty.

NDBI cover can also help transfer regulatory and product recall risks. The life science sector is expressing interest in this kind of solution for cases where a supplier goes bankrupt or is shut down by a regulator, or a medication needs to be recalled due to perceived flaws in the manufacturing process.

Experts say that concerns still to be addressed are NDBI losses caused by cyber attacks and pandemics.

Capacity is an ongoing concern. According to Swiss Re CS, $50 million to $100 million, or even more, can be achieved through foundation capacity provided by a lead insurer, with syndicated capacity to other insurers and reinsurers, depending on the risk. &

Rodrigo Amaral is a freelance writer specializing in Latin American and European risk management and insurance markets. He can be reached at [email protected]